The Long Arm Of Israel (The Anti Zionist Zionists)

We have learned in the last few days that some Jewish ‘anti’ Zionist elements are planning to interfere with Zero Books’ The Wandering Whobook launch this Monday.

Your support for the book and also for the freedom of speech is most welcome.

Book Launch: A Panel Discussion on ‘Jewish Identity Politics’

Monday, 10th October, 2011, 7:00 pm

Resource for London

356 Holloway Road

London N7 6PA

The truth of the matter is that Israel’s long arm is not necessarily just the Mossad as you may have thought. The title fits nicely to some of our so-called Jewish ‘anti’ Zionist stooges.

Predictably, half a dozen Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists, who have beenterrorizing the Palestinian solidarity movement and activists for decades are also very unhappy with my new book The Wandering Who. This is understandable for my new book doesn’t just expose Zionist cultural and ideological morbidity, it also exposes the level of duplicity that is entangled with Jewish ‘anti’ Zionist discourse. The book depicts a clear ideological continuum between the ADL and the so-called Jewish progressive cells. In fact, The Wandering Who openly criticises any form of Jewish secular political discourse Zionist and anti Zionist for being racially oriented. Jewish political activism and identity politics are basically nothing but different forms of a racially exclusive political exercise.

It didn’t take me by complete surprise to find out that J-Big  (Jews Only Israeli Boycott Campaign) are operating relentlessly against the book. I always asked myself, how long is it going to take before J-Big contaminates my song with one of their Ava Nagilas  or any other Jewish folklore anthem. It is almost amusing to follow the distorted Jewish progressive interpretation of the BDS. Instead of mounting pressure on Israel or its Hasbara agents, J-BIG is now trying to suppress intellectual exchange within our movement.

In recent years I have gathered information about Jewish ‘anti Zionist’ leaders operating constantly against other Palestinian solidarity activists. I have seen Sara Kershnar and Mich Levy of the ‘Jewish Anti Zionist Network (IJAN) operating against myself and others in the USA and in Germany. I have exposed Naomi Wimborne Idrissi operating in a clandestine manner within our movement.  I have exposed the infamous  Roland Rance and his Wikipedia Jews network vandalising activists’ Wikipedia entries.

I recently published a short video that allowed leading Palestinian solidarity activists to tell our Jewish ‘anti’ Zionist’ stooges what we think of them and their ‘activism’.

While our ‘anti Zionist Zionists’ prefer to operate in a conspiratorial manner behind the scene. Tony Greenstein, bless him, voluntarily provides us with a glimpse into Jewish anti Zionist deceit. Greenstein’s site is probably the ultimate spectacle of a Jewish ‘progressive’ tantrum.

Greenstein is certainly desperate to stop The Wandering Who. Following the most vile Talmudic tactics he smears every person who supports the book. But to his dismay he found out recently that both himself and his ADL stooges are actually cornered and isolated, standing against some of the most respected humanists in this world.

Here are some of the recent endorsements for The Wandering Who:

Endorsements:

“Gilad Atzmon decided to open Pandora’s Box, and ignite a debate that has been frustratingly dormant for too long. His experiences are most authentic, views are hard-hitting, and, at times, provocative. It must be read and discussed.”  Ramzy Baroud,  Palestine Chronicle

“A transformative story told with unflinching integrity that all (especially Jews) who care about real peace, as well as their own identity, should not only read, but reflect upon and discuss widely.” Professor Richard Falk

‘Essential to an understanding of Jewish identity politics and the role they play on the world stage.’ Professor John J. Mearsheimer 

“Atzmon’s insight into the organism created by the Zionist movement is explosive.” Professor William A. Cook

“A pioneering work that deserves to be read and Gilad Atzmon is brave to write this book!” Dr. Samir Abed-Rabbo

“Gilad’s escape from spiritual claustrophobia towards a free and open humanitarianism is fearless” Robert Wyatt

“In his inimitable deadpan style, Atzmon identifies the abscess in the Jewish wisdom tooth – exilic tribalism – and pulls it out. Ouch!” Eric Walberg, Al Aharam Weekly

“It is more than an academic exercise. It is a revelation!” Lauren Booth, Press TV

“A brilliant analysis that makes what appear to be contradictions in Jewish identity based political behavior not only comprehensible but predictable.” Jeff Blankfort

“Atzmon has the courage – so profoundly lacking among Western intellectuals” Professor James Petras

“Having known Gilad for 25 years, I read the book in English, I heard it in Hebrew and reflected on it in Arabic. Gilad Atzmon is astonishingly courageous” Dr. Makram Khoury-Machool

“A fascinating achievement” Dr Oren Ben Dor

“Gilad Atzmon is someone who encompasses what it means to be an intellectual.” Kim Petersen, Dissident Voice

“Gilad Atzmon is the Moses of our time, calling all of us out of the Egypt of our boneheaded nationalisms and racialisms and exceptionalisms and chosen-people-isms toward some form of humanistic universalism.”  Dr. Kevin Barrett

“Perhaps only a musician could have written this sensitive, perceptive lament over how so many Jews, believing themselves to be doing ‘what is good for the Jews,’ have managed to carve the heart out of the Palestinian nation and make this tragedy look like the natural order of things.” Kathleen  Christison

Are They Really ‘The People Of The Book’?

Ahead of the publication of my “” the entire Zionist network is in a total panic. Veterans Today’s senior Editor Gordon Duff  commented yesterday that just a ‘few books have been opposed as this one has’. He may as well be right.

It started last  Friday, with the Hasbara mouthpiece “Jewish Chronicle” of London attacking Professor Mearsheimer for endorsing a book ‘by an antisemite’.

I don’t know how many times do I have to mention that I am not an antisemite for I really  hate everyone equally. For some reason, my detractors refuse to take this simple message on board.

Then, the Islamophobic agent-provocateur “Harry’s place” — who never miss a chance to muddy the water — joined in, intimidating and harassing  a London academic  just because she tweeted that she likes Atzmon’s book

Just before London Tea Time, America woke up. Within the hour, her Zionist stooges were ready to join the campaign. EX- IDF concentration camp guard Jeffrey Goldberg* had a clear plan to chew Professor John J. Mearsheimer circulating the same banal andunsubstantiated accusations.

At that stage, it appeared to be a campaign that was run by hundreds of Zionist enthusiasts – but if one scratches the surface, it was actually an orchestrated move of barely more than five Jewish bloggers, who have managed to mobilise another twenty or so book burners or shall we call them ‘wandering  sockpuppets’ that habitually attack in different areas of the net and the press, co-coordinating to harass, bully and intimidate, with the same dull, repetitive, accusations, ‘arguments’ and smears.

By Sunday night the Guardian published an appalling piece by one of Swindon , who, according to one of his “Socialist Unity” editors, attacked Atzmon simply to appease the relentlessly Islamophobic “Harry’s Place” public.

Top columnist and Middle East analyst Jonathan Cook reacted to the Guardian smear saying, “whatever one thinks of Atzmon, this is clearly a smear job of him (and Alison Weir). Where is the evidence, or even convincing argument, for the claims being made?  It is pure Pravda.” Not exactly a flattering comment on the Guardian.

By then it was clear that  Islamophobic Award winning Harry’s Placewasn’t going to stop.

In fact Harry Place’s, Goldberg and JC collective shameless tantrum is explored. I define it as ‘Pre Traumatic Stress Syndrome,’ as opposed to Post Traumatic stress syndrome. They are all terrorized and genuinely traumatized by a book they refuse to read with the hope that the Goyim may surrender and ban it on their behalf.

On Monday afternoon, Professor Mearsheimer published acomplete expose  of  Goldberg’s lameness and the  tactics he and his ilk use against myself and others. They quote out of context, they ‘copy and paste’, they forge paragraphs, they deliberately and consciously attribute misleading meanings. In fact, none of those who reacted to the book negatively has read the book or any of my papers. They all refer to quotes that were picked arbitrarily from the ‘Amazon Lookinside page’. I find myself wondering, are these people really the ‘People of the Book’? I guess that People of  the ‘Copy & Paste’ is a much  better description for  Goldberg  and his wandering sockpuppets.

Within minutes after Mearsheimer revealed the typical deceitful operation, the wandering sockpuppets were called in to fight Mearsheimer and Walt at the “Foreign Affair Journal” site. By the time they finished posting their filth, the respected magazine comment section looked indeed like a cyber shtetle.

In a final  desperate attempt to jeopardize the publication of the book and to silence its author. Richard Seymour AKA ‘Lenin Thumb’,  authored a new antiAtzmon manifesto  

I read Richard ‘Lenin’ Seymour’s  text with interest and found out that for some reason, both ‘avant-garde revolutionary’  Seymour’s text, and Guardian’s ‘socialist’  Andy Newman’s drivel are suspiciously far too similar to the unforgettable ‘Aaronovitch Reading Atzmon’ performance at the Oxford Literature Festival.

One may wonder how come Seymour, an alleged revolutionary radical Marxist, Andy Newman, a mediocre socialist  and Neocon pro war Aaronovitch are caught together naked holding ideological  hands.

How is it that the three try  to prevent myself and others from criticising Jewish political lobbying. For some reason they also don’t want us to look closely into the events that led to the financial turmoil. How is it possible that a hard core Zionist and ultra radical leftists are not only employing the same ideological argument but also performing the exact same tactics?  Clearly, there is an obvious ideological and political continuum between Aaronovitch, Newman and Seymour. scrutinizes this very continuum.

Zionism clearly  maintains and sustains  its ‘radical left opposition’ and the logos behind such a tactic is simple- ‘revolutionary’ left is totally irrelevant to both the conflict and its resolution. Hence, Zionists cannot dream of an easier opposition to handle. When the Zionists detect a dangerous rising intellect who aims at the truth, they obviously utilize and mobilize the Jewish left together with the few willing Sabbath Goyim executioners to gatekeep the emerging danger. Seymour, Newman and a just few others are always happy to slay the emerging intellect.

Indeed they were effective for years. From an intellectual perspective our movement is pretty much a desert. Every deep thinker we have ever had has been targeted and destroyed by the Jewish Left and their Sabbath Goyim.  But for some reason, they somehow failed with me. My views on Palestine and Israel are now circulated on most dissident journals and my book The Wandering Who is endorsed by the most important people scholars and activists in our discourse.

So far, all efforts to stop the book have fallen apart . There is no sign of anyone pulling the book out but there are clear signs that the Hasbara orchestrated campaign has backfired. No one surrendered to the Zionist campaign and its stooges. As they said in Tahrir Square, ‘we have lost our fear.’   The Wandering Who is now a best seller for more than a week (as far as Amazon ranking can tell). On the Jewish best seller list, it is even more popular than the Babylonian Talmud and the Torah. I guess that this is indeed a great concern for Zionists and  their stooges, but there is nothing they can do about it.

911 Ten Years After

This 911 Memorial Day, ten years after, will be heard from every corner of the country. The media will emphasize the emotional horror and avoid the reasons that have transformed our native soil into an armed camp of distrust and despair. No matter where you come down on the multiple explanations about the actual attack on lower Manhattan and the Pentagon, or who was really behind the planning and execution, one fact is indisputable. Namely, that NOTHING good has happened in the last decade for ordinary citizens or for the quality of life of the nation. The America of our birth is history. The police state of homeland security is the true terror. The government of bipartisan dictatorship is the essential dread. The cultural denial of objective reality is the final death.

In order to place the significance of the September 11, 2001 into context with the help of hindsight, one can review the numerous accounts that deal with every imaginable aspect of the excuse that rationalizes each higher level of tyranny committed in the name of a mystical goal of national security. Viewing an account like,  is a strong contender of establishing the perspective and circumstance that the official 911 report wants you to ignore. However, an examination of an initial response published the day of the treason, demonstrates that little enlightenment has touched the minds of those who continually serve the empire. When Will America Learn? – Squarely exposes the destructive internationalist foreign policy that only advances the interests of fifth column globalists that scheme to destroy the last remnants of our constitutional republic.

Gravity is one of the most powerful forces in the universe. But it pales in comparison to the insanity that festers in the American Psyche. Wholesale denial will be the legacy of the horror that struck our Nation today. The root cause for evil – lies within each of us. When its ugly head rises to a height that all can see, we tend to ignore our own complicity. Blame the perpetrators as criminals, as well we should; but most neglect to look within themselves for their unwillingness to confront depravity.

Acceptance of insane Foreign Policy in the name of Patriotism breeds the ultimate reaction that nature provides. Who among us are surprised? Is there anyone left that can honestly say that America is NOT viewed with the greatest contempt among the most disgruntled elements of terror? Terrorism is wrong. Violence is not justified. But it will become the typical pattern, as long as JUSTICE is viewed through myopic lenses.

It has long been argued that neutrality in Middle East Policy is in the best interest of America. Today that contention is no longer debatable. Continued support for Israel has brought the plague to our shores. It is not only our first-born sons who were slaughtered. The lamb of innocence died in the heap of rubble that is now New York City.

When the zealot, favors the prospect of death to peaceful coexistence; the consequences can only inflict the most dreadful outcome. The jihad against the infidel is a direct result of an unholy alliance with a country that inflicts their own form of terror upon a native population. Neither party has any high ground of morality. Both are equally responsible for the suffering and death that this blood feud imposes on a region and now our own land. It is payback time and we are unwilling to recognize our responsibility for this debt.

When your leaders wear the mantle of the Zionist, your children will pay. It does not make it right, but that is the tragic reality of blind support for interests that are not our own. Moral outrage is hypercritical when it has been denied for decades. Balance in official policy has never existed, nor has prudence in our own self-interest.

Those who wave the ‘bloody flag’ are the preceptors of mass suicide. Today’s causality list will be relegated to an asterisk, when the nukes start to explode. If the world community seeks to unify their ‘New World Order’ upon the bodies of terrorists that they constructed, we will surely create the seeds of martyrs, for future generations.

When the Ford’s, Haig’s and Eagleburger’s call for swift and strong retribution, be forewarned that the war against America will only intensify. This is not an issue of manhood, but one of endorsing a cause that conflicts with ours. What benefit will any of us see when the landscape of more of our cities resemble that of lower Manhattan?

Will you people ever get it? Or will it take the funeral of your family to paint the picture for you? If you purport to be patriotic, your duty is to stop support for Israel. Their fight is not yours, but we will pay for their sins. Does this make sense to you?

America will cease to exist when a public whose emotional naiveté will scream for retribution will readily accept totalitarian measures! Folks, the enemy is us; for our involvement in the creation of hostilities that seeks to obliterate our symbols of ‘Pax American’.

Israel is not an ally, but is the cause of our sorrow. Wake up America, and divorce this soiled maiden. Does anyone share the pain of the Arab children that are suffering and dying from the one sided policy of U.N. enforcement? Until you acknowledge that Zionism has equal blood on its hands, you will bleed on your own flag.

The future is NOW! Moreover, what you decide will shape its course. It is time for an American First Foreign Policy, that will repudiate the role of a policeman for the world. Think before you demand pay back, for it will blow up in your own face. Recognize the real cause that threatens our country and way of life. Abandon the nation founded on guilt. Blame the terrorists for the body count and hold them accountable. But remove the reason for their hate. If you were part of the fourth world, you just might become your own freedom fighter.

America was suckered into WWII with the treachery of Pearl Harbor. Do not repeat this same mistake and let DEFCON ONE turn into a mushroom cloud that will engulf more than Wall Street. All life is sacred. Resist allowing America from falling into the trap of a domestic created form of Terror. Demand and establish Justice, and Peace will follow. SHALOM

SARTRE – September 11, 2001

Our economy is in meltdown. Exercising our freedoms are condemned as expressions of terrorism. Troops serving the transnational corporatist interests are used as, tools or targets, for butchery. The NeoCons and now the NeoLibs, betray every loyal American for their Talmud masters. Those who are unable to distinguish between Zionist rulers and expendable Jews or Israelis, share the same mental disease, as those who buy into the Al-Qaeda 911 myth of Islamic mastermind terrorism. The elites that further their global empires are quite eager to exterminate American, European, Jewish and Moslems in their quest for total supremacy.

911 is simply the best example of efficient and accelerated mind control that furthers the public demand for an increased and intensive totalitarian response for an imaginary threat. Sacrificing natural rights is patriotic for the modern day flag wavers of an evil government.

Hell is now the new normal. Government bureaucrats follow orders because they care more about their career than their integrity. The corporate titans suck up all the government contracts that bribes can buy. Making hay from the security revolution is big business. World Peace is sold short because the shekel is the dominate force that drives the foreign policy express.

Paleoconservatives are not fools. They understand the nature and extent of the corruption and treason that allowed the 911 diversion to kill our liberty and expand the American gulag. The Old Right were champions of an American First Foreign Policy during the last World War. The coming next global conflict will be fought from an easy chair by electronic drones that eviscerate whole societies with the flick of a joystick.

If you ignored the conclusion in the September 11, 2001 – When Will America Learn? – essay, what chance do you have now to discover the insidious lies that underpin the entire state sponsored war of terror. Read the 911 a saga of deceit and lies site for valuable resources from the first five years of the 911 truth movement.

Ten years after, the fools that populate popular culture produce even more committed political sycophants. Abandoning rationality, while defending the indefensible is their badge of pride. Yet, the lessons of fabricated deception are not lost on everyone. Hopefully you count yourself in this group.

This country will never survive a 20th anniversary of 911. The current police state will become the permanent prison of war stalag encampment because you dare express your Bill of Rights civil liberties. The true terrorism is domestic to the core and resides in a government gone bad.

“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US . . .” – Pierre-Henri Bunel, Former French Intelligence Officer

Did Israel’s Mossad Do 9/11?

Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth have made the crucial and informed point that it was impossible for a plane hitting the top of the Towers of the World Trade Center to bring down the entire edifices – but have proved, rather – that successive explosions occurred on various floors below.

The following Clip produced by American Patriot on the Live Link Web Site illustrates the most convincing analysis of these successive explosions as one’s eye moves from the top of the Tower to an ongoing continuum of explosions on successive stories below.

American Patriot quotes Scott Forbes who worked as a Data Administrator on the 97th floor of the South Tower that power was switched off for 36 hours the weekend prior to the 9/11 take-down, an unprecedented and first time event.

Drawing the conclusion that “interior demolition devices” were obviously installed prior to the attack, the conjecture that the 9/11tragedy was planned, engineered and executed by Zionist interests is gaining greater currency even among such notables as Dr Alan Sabrosky, former professor of the US Army College. [Clip: “It is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad Operation. Period.”]

In his landmark article, “Treason, Betrayal and Deceit – 9/11 & Beyond,” Dr Sabrosky concludes that only the Israeli Intelligence Agency, The Mossad, had the expertise, assets, the access and the political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground.

Using the ‘Who Benefits’ principle, Sabrosky points out that the Mossad’s incentive dovetailed perfectly with the Jewish neo-con’s program for a catalytic event to mobilize the American public for their Zionist wars, using American military power to destroy Jewry’s enemies abroad – and, I add – to create a police state at home to stifle any criticism of Jewry’s activities and agenda.

Sabrosky also observes that the Jewish-owned mainstream media is more interested in publicizing Sarah Palin’s wardrobe than presenting the overwhelming dissenting views challenging the official 9/11 narrative from experts in various disciplines, whether architects, engineers, scientists, scholars, pilots, or firemen.

In a subsequent article, “Israel’s Hidden Faces,” Dr Sabrosky presents circumstantial evidence that links 9/11 to The Mossad and its Judaic agents in America.

The most striking points of Dr Sabrosky’s exposé and my own research are:

1. The controlled demolition of Tower 7 upon which no plane hit when Larry Silverstein, Jewish owner of the World Trade Center, ordered the Tower taken down hours later with the words, “Pull It,” proves that if one building was wired for controlled demolition, then all three were as well.

2. The company providing security to the World Trade Center, Kroll Associates, was apparently operated by Zionists.

3. The owners and operators of Kroll Associates and their immediate relatives were absent save one Gentile new employee the morning of 9/11.

And only 3 out of 4,000 Israelis working at the Towers were at their jobs and died in the explosions.

And Larry Silverstein, Jewish owner of the World Trade Center, just so happened to have a ‘doctor’s appointment’ that morning.

4. Five Israelis were seen filming the explosions on a roof in nearby New Jersey and visibly celebrating…having set up their cameras before the first plane hit.

Soon, after their arrest – and in spite of the evidence against them – they were released and the case dropped by the then head of the US Department of Justice Criminal Division and soon to be Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Talmudic Jew and Israeli dual citizen, Michael Chertoff.

5. The 9/11 Commission was stacked with pro-Israel appointees, with the Jewish Executive Director, Philip Zelikow, ensuring that nothing deflecting attention from Osama bin Ladin and his supposed ‘19 Arab accomplices,’ would make the final report.

My friends, what we have here is the obvious guilt of The Mossad and the complicity of its Judaic agents in America of the 9/11 tragedy.

All that is missing, as Dr Sabrosky so eloquently points out, is a public confession!

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=647

Dontcha hate it when corporatists pretend to be Christians, Jews & Muslims?

Hey!  All you guys with the billion-dollar bank accounts!  Don’t you know that religions were founded on the principle of enriching the human spirit — not on enriching your own personal wealth.  Rich men can’t fit through the eye of a needle.  End of story.  Period.  God, I hate people who use religion as a means to get rich.

Would greedy bastards like Bush, Perry, Bachmann, Palin, Boener — or even Obama — ever be able to pass the Jesus test?  Hardly.  The Sermon on the Mount went right over their heads.  Corporatists pretending to be Christians?  That’s pathetic.

And what if Abraham or Moses came back to visit us earthlings today?  They would both kick Netanyahu’s butt!  “Read your Talmud!” they’d yell at him.  Corporatists pretending to be Jews?  That’s pathetic.

Would Mohammed approve of the Saudis bombing Bahrainian Muslims for fun and profit?  Or Sunnis and Shias killing each other by the thousands because of oil disputes?  Not on your life!  Corporatists pretending to be Muslims?  That’s pathetic.

It says “Under God” in our Pledge of Allegiance.  Do you ever see God approving of the resource wars that are now being conducted in His (or Her) name?  Hardly.  Do you ever see God approving of cutting Social Security to old folks and essentially giving them a death sentence so that the Pentagon can afford even more million-dollar drones to allow them to kill even more women and children?  Dudes, get a grip.

And speaking of our Pledge of Allegiance, it also says, “With Liberty and Justice for all”.  I can’t see that happening right now in America either, can you?

In today’s world based on corporate greed, it’s not all about God — or Jesus or Abraham or Mohammed either.  It’s all about money.  It’s all about worshiping the Golden Calf — and then calling it religion.

Don’t any of you corporatists EVER talk to me about religion ever again.  Talk to God about that.  And I would love to hear God’s reply.  “Go to Hell!”

I bet that if you added up all the human beings that corproratists have killed since the end of World War II (that famous war fought to make the world safe from corporatists!), you might find that corporatists have been responsible for more deaths than Stalin, Hitler and Mao combined — hard to believe at first but then if you count in the various resource wars in sub-Saharan Africa, Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, Sudan, Libya, Iraq and Central and South America plus various other wars for oil and all the monetary fund victims dying from drought, slave wages and/or starvation from Somalia to Haiti to the DRC, and the disastrous War on Drugs plus all the deadly stunts pulled by both Bushes, Johnson, NAFTA, Clinton, Kissinger, Obama, Reagan, etc., I’d be very interested in the results.

But at least Hitler, Stalin and Mao didn’t claim to do all their killing in the name of religion.

The Herem Law in the context of Jewish Past and Present

The European Union appear concerned about the new Israeliherem law. The law suggests that a person or an organisation calling for the boycott of Israel , including the settlements, can be sued by the boycotts’ targets, without having to prove that they sustained any damage.

“We are concerned about the effect that this legislation may have on the freedom of Israeli citizens and organisations to express non-violent political opinions” said spokesperson for foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton.

More and more people and institutions now understand that Israel is not a ‘civilised society’: it is impervious to notions of human and civil rights, and it also does not share the common and fundamental foundations of a Western value system.  Israel is not a democracy and it has never been one. At the most, Israel has managed to mimic some of the appearances of a Western civilisation, but it has clearly failed to internalise the meaning of tolerance and freedom.

This should not take us by surprise: Israel defines itself as a Jewish state, and Jewishness is, sadly enough, inherently intolerant; indeed, it may be argued that Jewish intolerance is as old as the Jews themselves.

Regarding legislation then, how are we to understand the implications of the word ‘herem’? The Hebrew word herem in its contemporary usage refers to a ban,  boycott and sanction. However, within the biblical context, the word suggests the total destruction of the enemy and his goods at the conclusion of a campaign.

The emergence of Christianity then, can be viewed as an attempt to rectify such a situation of stark intolerance — it can be understood as an attempt to drift away from The Old Testament’s dark ideology. Christianity introduced ideas of harmony and love. And it is no wonder that the man who dared suggest to his Judean contemporaries to ‘love their neighbours’ ended up nailed to wood. He himself ended up being subject to a vile homicidal herem campaign.

Uriel Da Costa

The spirit of herem is intrinsic to the Judaic teaching and spirit. Many people are aware of Spinoza being subject to a Rabbinical herem. Yet, not many are familiar with the story of Uriel Da Costa.

Da Costa was born a Catholic in 1585 in Porto, Portugal. From an early stage, Da Costa was aware that his family had Jewish origins, and in the course of his studies, he began to consider a return to Judaism. By 1617, Da Costa and his family had decided to return to Judaism, and they fled Portugal for Amsterdam, which was soon to become a thriving centre of the Sephardic Diaspora.

Once in the Netherlands though, Da Costa very quickly became disenchanted with Rabbinical Judaism. He came to believe that the Rabbinic leadership was consumed by rituals and (Talmudic) legalism. In 1624 Da Costa  published a book entitled “An Examination of the Traditions of the Pharisees”, which questioned the fundamental belief in the immortality of the soul. The work also pointed out the discrepancies between biblical Judaism and Rabbinical Judaism.

The book was considered controversial and publicly burned. Da Costa was called before the Rabbinic leadership of Amsterdam for uttering blasphemous views against Judaism and Christianity, was fined a significant sum, and subject to herem. 

In 1633  Costa sought reconciliation with the community. He vowed to go back to being “an ape amongst the apes.” However, soon enough, he began to express rationalistic and skeptical views again, for instance,  expressing doubts whether biblical law was divinely sanctioned, or whether it was simply written down by Moses. He came to the conclusion that all religions were human inventions, ultimately rejecting formalised, ritualised religion. Possibly the first atheist Jew, Da Costa came to believe that religion should be based only on natural law, believing that God resides in nature, which is full of peace and harmony, whereas organised religion is marked by violence and strife.

It did not take long before Da Costa became, once again, subject to Rabbinical herem. For seven years he lived in virtual isolation, shunned by his family and loved ones. Ultimately, the loneliness was too much for him to bear, and he recanted once more.

As a punishment for his heretical views, he was publicly given thirty nine lashes at the Portuguese synagogue in Amsterdam, then forced to lie on the floor while the congregation trampled over him. The events left Da Costa traumatised, and he became suicidal. After writing his autobiography, “Exemplar Humanae Vitae” (1640), in which he disclosed his experience as a victim of Jewish intolerance, he set out to end the lives of both his cousin and himself. Seeing his relative approach one day, he grabbed a pistol and pulled the trigger, but it misfired. Then he reached for another, turned it on himself and fired, reportedly dying a terrible death.

Zionists and ‘Anti Zionists’ Alike

The record of vile Rabbinical measures against dissidence is staggering. But unfortunately, Jewish intolerance exceeds far beyond religious institutions.  In Israel, it seems that Jews imposeherems on each other on a daily basis.  The so called ‘Israeli left’ imposes herem on the West Bank settlements (as if Tel Aviv is not a settlement), and in response, the right wing governmentherems the left heremiates .

And as we all know, prominent Jewish critical voices outside of Israel too such as Norman Finkelstein,  have been subject to relentless Zionist herems over the years.

However, one may find it astonishing that Jewish ‘anti Zionists’ who claim to be ‘progressive’, godless ‘atheists’ and  ‘cosmopolitans,’ also  consistently use the exact same Talmudicherem tactics that have been employed by their Rabbinical ancestors for hundred of years.

In the last decade we have come across more than a few Jewish ‘anti Zionist’ herem campaigns. Jewish ‘anti- Zionists’ single mindedly dedicated themselves to the destruction of Deir Yassin Remembered (DYR),which was at the time the biggest and most successful pro-Palestinian organisation in the UK.  Monitoring the contemptible language used by Jewish ‘anti Zionist’ campaigners and observing the strategies they  implement  against fellow anti- Zionist Jews  and Palestinian solidarity activists reveals a very grim picture and a repetition of the most horrendous Rabbinicalherem tactics.

But such a realisation and understanding of these Jewish ‘anti Zionist’ tactics should not really take us by surprise, after all, just like the Jewish State, the Jewish ‘anti Zionists’ also identify as Jews.

However, unlike Rabbinical Jews — who at least provide some reasoning for their severe judgements based on supposed transgression of Biblical tenets — the Jewish ‘anti Zionist’ concentrate solely on measures of punishment. Yet such a fact is hardly surprising : whilst hardly any of the so called ‘progressive’ Jewish ‘anti Zionists’ believe in God or follow the Torah — they have clearly managed to draw from Judaism its very worst methods i.e. brute and crude intolerance.

I too am obviously  subject to on going and constant herem campaigns,  conducted by various ethnic Jewish activists, both  Zionist and crypto-Zionists.

However, I am delighted to report that my detractors are not at all successful. In fact, they are by now growing accustomed to learn that their hopeless herem attempts to excommunicate me simply backfire, time after time, leaving them frustrated and more and more isolated from the public discourse regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict.

On reflection, I would conjecture that the growing circulation of my work has little to do with my talent or wisdom though. It is much more simple than that: rather, my perspective on  humanism and ethics is probably more straightforward, coherent, inclusive and consistent than the Jewish ‘anti Zionists’  pseudo progressive ethno-centric exclusivism, so clearly manifested in each of their herem campaigns and implicit in much of their writing.

Jews and the BDS

As one would expect, world Jewry welcome the new Israeli heremlaw. According to Ha’aretz, the umbrella organisation of French-Jewish groups in France (CRIF) hailed the  new Israeli herem law : “the CRIF’s director general Haim Musicant pointed out that a similar such law has long existed in France, much to the satisfaction of the French Jewish community.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also defended the new law, saying “what stains (Israel’s) image are those savage and irresponsible attacks on a democracy’s attempt to draw a line between what is acceptable and what is not.”

Netanyahu sums it up eloquently — the new Talmudic law is there to highlight and establish the terms regarding what is acceptable within ‘Kosher democracy’: it is a non-civilised setting driven by blatantly exclusivist policies. In a very similar manner, the Jewish so called ‘anti Zionists’ often enough claim to know what ‘Kosher anti Zionism’ is all about, and how its boundaries should be defined. Incredibly enough, the Jewish ‘anti Zionists’ also repeatedly preach to us about ‘who is good’ and ‘who is bad’ for the Palestinians.

I presume that by now, the continuum between Netanyahu’s attitudes and those of the crypto-Zionists within our midst is pretty well established, and clear enough for all of us to see.

In April, the renowned journalist and film maker Max Blumenthal addressed some questions regarding the Jewish hegemony within the BDS movement.  The BDS is a call initiated by Omar Barghouti  and Palestinian civil society to impose boycott, divestment and sanctions on Israel.

Blumenthal wrote, “last night I went to Columbia University to see Omar Barghouti discuss his new book, Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions: The Global Struggle for Palestinian Rights…  During his talk, Barghouti mentioned that he had approached J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami about arranging a debate on BDS. The response from Ben-Ami was as follows, according to Barghouti: ‘We want to keep this debate inside the Jewish community. So we won’t participate in a debate with any Palestinians.’”

“Last December”, Blumenthal continues, “I debated the issue of BDS against the director of J Street U, Daniel May. My debate partner was Rebecca Vilkomerson of Jewish Voice for Peace. Daniel May’s partner was a Jewish student from Princeton also named Daniel May. Everyone involved in the debate was an Ashkenazi Jew, yet we were debating a movement founded and controlled by Palestinian civil society.”

If you should ask yourself why J Street insists on running the BDS as a ‘Jewish internal affair,’ or why the BDS has become a ‘Jewish call’, here is the answer – the BDS is interpreted  by most Jews as a call for a herem,  and this is what Jews do best : destroying, excluding, excommunicating, silencing, boycotting, sanctioning. After all, Jews have been doing this for centuries.

But here arises another problem regarding Jewish over representation and control within the boycott movement. As much as many of us sympathise with the Palestinian civil society call, hardly any of us actually want to operate within, or take direction on what we should do and think from a Jewish ‘anti Zionist’ Trotsky-ite synagogue.  And as it happens — and this makes me very sad at times — some of the crypto Zionists who operate within the BDS movement are now using this important Palestinian call in order to promote Jewish interests, or to fight other Palestinian solidarity activists.

But I believe that for the BDS to be successful, this movement must be attentive first and foremost to the Palestinian call, and to that call above all others. For the BDS to be effective it must transcend itself beyond the banal herem type activity. It must be a universal call, and managed as a civil society campaign.

Herem, Post Herem and a Joke 

Israel and Zionism then, has proved to be a short lived dream. It was  initiated to civilise Jewish life, and to dismantle the Jewish self-destructive mode. It was there to move the Jew into the postherem phase. It vowed to make the Jew into a productive being. But as things turned out, neither the Zionists nor the ‘anti Zionists’ managed to drift away from the disastrous  heremculture. It seems that  the entire world of Jewish identity politics is a matrix of herems and exclusion strategies. In order to be ‘a proper Jew’, all you have to do is to point out whom you oppose, hate, exclude or boycott.

Such a state of affairs is indeed pretty tragic, but it certainly brings to mind the old Jewish joke:

Q: How many synagogues are needed in a village with just  one single Jewish habitant?

A: Two synagogues; one that he goes to, and one he would never set foot in.

Out of the Belly of AIPAC and Why I am too RED to be Pink!

AIPAC/American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual conference brought together over 11,000 sisters, brothers and cousins in the Family of Father Abraham-including 1,500 youth representing 400 schools and 215 universities, 500 journalists from 2 dozen countries and representatives of over 100 endorsing organizations to Move AIPAC Over: http://www.moveoveraipac.org/

On 22 May 2011, inside the Washington Convention Center, Lee Rosenberg, the President of AIPAC greeted that crowd by saying:

“We are here because we care and decided to do something.”

Do Something has been a mantra of mine ever since my first of 7 trips to Israel and Occupied Palestine: Read more…

Because I care so much and love America and the promises and spirit of Israel’s Declaration of Independence:

“On the day of the termination of the British mandate and on the strength of the United Nations General Assembly declare The State of Israel will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel: it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion it will guarantee freedom of religion [and] conscience and will be faithful to the Charter of the United Nations.” – May 14, 1948, The Declaration of the Establishment of Israel

I recently decided to live out a dream I began dreaming after my first trip to occupied territory in 2005, which is to run for U.S. House of Representatives as the first candidate for the

Because it is no longer enough to just write my broken heart out over the 44 years of military occupation of the indigenous people of the so called Holy Land-which is in pieces; disconnected enclaves that in no way can become a sustainable Palestinian state if this map remains the same:

And because “Everywhere except in America, the Palestinian narrative is well known.“-Rashid Khaladi Read more… my conscience compelled me to attend AIPAC’s annual conference to listen, learn and discern;

And also so I could introduce myself as a reporter who has been to Israel 7 times since 2005 [I did not mention I spent most all my time in occupied Palestine] because knowledge brings responsibilities, so I am looking for a district in Florida to represent in the US House of Representatives.

[Everyone I told that I was on staff with Salem-news.com which is based in Oregon assumed it was based in Connecticut and all were impressed that I was a columnist for the Military and Foreign Affairs Journal Veteranstoday.com ]

Everyone responded to me warmly and I felt a kinship with all, but the rebel in me rejoiced that if and when any click onto my website I may blow many minds.

As PRESS I could have been in the audience for Prime Minister Netanyahu’s address at Monday night’s gala, but I chose to remain outside the door greeting all with “Shalom, I love America and Israel so much that I am running for Congress.”

Many accepted my business card, some ignored me and one young man hit the card out of my hand. No doubt he acted out as a reaction to the vocal activists affiliated with Move AIPAC Over [as the founder of We Are Wide Awake I am an endorser] who seized their right to free speech to demand an end to the occupation and oppression of Gaza Palestine.

During Monday night’s gala while Prime Minister Netanyahu addressed the crowd, about a dozen courageous activists for justice and peace rose up vocally to Move AIPAC Over and one was tackled and injured by AIPAC participants.

During Netanyahu’s address to Congress on Tuesday morning, just after the Prime Minister spoke about the youth around the world rising up for more democracy, 28 year old CODEPINK activist Rae Abileah was assaulted and forced to the ground by AIPAC members in the House Gallery as she stood up with a banner that read “Occupying Land Is Indefensible” while shouting, “No more occupation, stop Israel war crimes, equal rights for Palestinians, occupation is indefensible.”

Rae was arrested by D.C. police for disturbing the peace at George Washington University Hospital where she was being treated for neck and shoulder injuries. Rae had no regrets for her physical pain and said she stands in solidarity with the Palestinian and Israeli activists who are routinely jailed and beaten for speaking out for democracy.

This reporter applauds the commitment and chutzpah of all the stand up and vocal activists; but I choose a different way to rise up for it has been understood for millennium that if you want to change the world: WRITE!

“I understand the need to engage in a peaceful and civilized conversation.”-Sasha Matthews, AIPAC Campus Activist from Florida A&M University.

Sasha spoke those words and shared her story during a Sunday AIPAC break-out group, “From Campus to Congress: Deflecting Detractors and Exerting Real Influence.”

Sasha also explained, “I am a baby in this movement and I am not Jewish or political. As a Christian I learned about the historical ties to the Jewish State in church, but I had only a lukewarm interest.”

America and Israel partner closely in the field of science and technology and as a physics student Sasha, “became engaged” and was then “bombarded” with information from AIPAC.

Sasha said, “My issue is getting students involved and the focus of my action is to attract students in general with balloons, music and food and then bombard them with all the information-ammo that AIPAC provides.

“I have partnered with FSU’s Hillel [The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life] as I understand the need to engage in a peaceful and civilized discussion.”

Before Sasha spoke, the facilitator brought up –and demeaned the work of Mearsheimer and Walt, and chances are that most of the AIPAC campus activists have not yet read: The Israel Lobby by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt Read more…

Mearsheimer and Walt were keynote speakers on 21 May 2011 for Move AIPAC Over

President Obama’s Sunday morning address to AIPAC was met with energetic applause and a few standing ovations.

Obama spoke about the dangers of the spread of nuclear weapons but not a word about Israel’s still un-inspected WMD facility-which everyone in the world, except most Americans learned about in 1987, when Mordechai Vanunu’s photos and testimony made front page news in London’s The Sunday Times.

Obama told of his experience at the Hall of Names at Yad Vashem and how he reflected upon the modern day fear of nuclear war.

As it is human nature to desire what the other has, only a Nuclear Weapons Free Middle East-and World-can obliterate that potential!

Obama also mentioned his visit to the Wailing Wall and how he thought about the generations who have wanted a homeland; but not a word was uttered about the generations of indigenous Palestinians who are still denied their inalienable right to return home or about the 21st century Wailing Wall, as nailed by Vanunu Mordechai:

Obama told of his visit to Sderot and the struggles of those residents, but he neglected to travel five minutes away into the open air prison of Gaza where 1.5 million human beings-800,000 are under the age of 16-struggle every moment of the day just to survive under a brutal siege aided and abetted by USA policy!

I spent an evening in Sderot in 2009 and learned that most everyone there would be just as happy to migrate to Las Vegas than live in Israel: Read more…

Israel’s existence is a fact of life, but what can never be accepted is Israel’s ‘right’ to steal land and resources of the indigenous people of Palestine!

All through the AIPAC conference I heard the incessant drumbeat of Israel’s rights, about the “special relationship” “shared values” “common Interests” the “Jewish State” and claims that Israel is a democracy, but Israel is not-and never has been a Democracy!

In the May 28, 1993 edition of Yedioth Ahronoth, Ariel Sharon explained:

“The terms ‘democracy’ or ‘democratic’ are totally absent from the Declaration of Independence. This is not an accident. The intention of Zionism was not to bring democracy, needless to say. It was solely motivated by the creation in Eretz-Isrel of a Jewish state belonging to all the Jewish people and to the Jewish people alone. This is why any Jew of the Diaspora has the right to immigrate to Israel and to become a citizen of Israel.”

Jeff Halper, American Israeli, co-founder and coordinator of Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions and Professor of Anthropology wrote:

“An ethnocracy is the opposite of a democracy, although it might incorporate some elements of democracy such as universal citizenship and elections. It arises when one particular group-the Jews in Israel, the Russians in Russia, the Protestants in pre-1972 Northern Ireland, the whites in apartheid South Africa, the Shi’ite Muslims in Iran, the Malay in Malaysia and, if they had their way, the white Christian fundamentalists in the US-seize control of the government and armed forces in order to enforce a regime of exclusive privilege over other groups in what is in fact a multi-ethnic or multi-religious society. Ethnocracy, or ethno-nationalism, privileges ethnos over demos, whereby one’s ethnic affiliation, be it defined by race, descent, religion, language or national origin, takes precedence over citizenship in determining to whom a county actually ‘belongs.'”[1]

In his Farewell Address, President George Washington warned US:

“Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all…and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave…a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils.”

It was President Harry Truman who crossed out the word “Jewish state” on the draft of the Establishment of Israel that was cabled him and substituted “State of Israel” which he affirmed was contingent upon Israel upholding the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

Read more…

Obama admitted that true friends speak open and honestly and that “the current situation does not allow procrastination. The world is moving too fast [and] the Talmud teaches as long as one has life do not abandon faith. We will never abandon universal human rights.”

All this American dissident writer has been saying since I went online in 2005 after my first of 7 trips to Israel and Occupied Palestine is that when Israel honors its founding promises and America upholds its obligation as a Member State of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, then YES WE CAN and YES WE WILL begin this world again.

Godspeed on it!

1. Jeff Halper, An Israeli in Palestine: Resisting Dispossession, Redeeming Israel, Page 74

AIPAC Zionists – the Archenemy of the American Nation

The habitual pilgrimage to kiss the ring of the “Khazar conspiracy” is upon us once again. The late great and trustworthy friend Alan Stang sheds light on the political movement called Zionism. “Presumably the Jews in Israel are Zionists, or they would leave. But there are only a few million Israelis. In the United States, there are scores of millions of Christians in mainline churches who are Zionists and who support Israel as staunchly as any Israeli, with funds as well as prayer.” He continues, “Consider that tens of thousands of Jews not only are not Zionists; they fervently oppose Zionism. They believe that Zionism is condemned by Holy Scripture.”

Within this context, the only way to view the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is as a pressure group that favors the political interests of a foreign nation at the expense of our own nation. The hordes of heretic Christian Zionists disgrace themselves because they cling to a false interpretation of scripture and are oblivious to the best self-interests of their own country.

Next watch the incomparable Paul Craig Roberts explain how . Finally, YouTube tops off the case against this unholy alliance.

Gilad Atzmon offers up this insight. “When analyzing the work and influence of AIPAC within American politics it is the Book of Esther that we should bear in mind. AIPAC is more than a mere political lobby. AIPAC is a modern-day Mordechai, the AJC is modern-day Mordechai. Both AIPAC and AJC are inherently in line with the Hebrew Biblical school of thought. However, while the Mordechais are relatively easy to spot, the Esthers, those who act for Israel behind the scenes, are slightly more difficult to trace.”

Israel: Latest Victim of America’s Weird Foreign Policy?

Don’t even get me started on America’s failed foreign policy in the Middle East.  Just try to name even one country east of Suez that America hasn’t tampered with and made a mess of.  “Israel?” you might say.  Yeah right.  Just imagine what Israel would be like today if America had resisted the temptation to interfere with its policies, the direction it was taking and its priorities.

America, like some strange King Midas in reverse, seems to have completely screwed up everything that it touches in the Middle East.  And, yes, this statement appears to include Israel too.

First of all, in any kind of sane world Israel would have gotten its hand slapped for bombing the USS Liberty back in 1967.  But it didn’t.  34 U.S. sailors were deliberately and callously murdered by Israeli armed forces and apparently no hand-slapping was involved — with the possible exception of some bizarre spy vs. spy story from Wayne Madsen about America then sinking an Israel submarine in retaliation and then Israel sinking a French submarine to get even and also sinking a U.S. cargo ship returning empty from Iran after dumping off tons of weapons from Reagan to the Ayatollah, thus getting in the last word.  http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/oldsite/article.asp?ID=10051.

If this bizarre story is true, however, America’s and Israel’s leaders’ foreign policies and moral compasses are even more off-base than we thought!

And after the USS Liberty incident, Israel’s leadership must have been on top of the world.  “Wow!” they must have said to themselves in stunned disbelief.  “If Americans let us get away with deliberately murdering 34 U.S. sailors in cold blood, they’ll let us get away with anything!  Let’s go for it guys.”  And apparently they did.

America over the past several decades has appeared to support every single bad thing that Israel has done since its inception.  “America NEVER sends us to our room without any supper — no matter how badly we behave!” seemed to the message that America sent to Israel’s leadership after the USS Liberty was heartlessly attacked, bombed and strafed.

So Israel, like some naughty child, was allowed to pull as many wings off as many Middle East butterflies at it wanted to.  That mess in Lebanon in the 1980?  That mess in Lebanon in 2006?  The heartless bombing of Gaza with deadly white phosphorus that killed hundreds of women and children in 2008?  Rachel Corrie’s death-by-bulldozer in 2003?  Go for it!

And even more important, Israel has suffered inestimable harm to its international reputation as a religious nation.  And it has suffered economic harm.  And moral harm.  And its citizens have become racists and murderers without even a qualm.  The whole country looks like South Africa during Apartheid or Warsaw during World War II.  Yuck!  

Not to mention the price Israel has to pay as its returning soldiers suffer from PTSS.

Not to mention the price Israel has to pay as its entire civilian population suffers from PTSS!

“But Jane,” you might say, “if Israelis hadn’t fought back, then Palestinians would have thrown them into the sea!”  Not true.  That “Poor Me, underdog, David vs. Goliath” story is getting more and more unbelievable every day days.  Did David own a whole fleet of F16 jets or over 200 nuclear weapons?  I think not.

Not only that, but a huge number of Israelis these days are voluntarily throwing their own selves into the sea.  We will never know how many Israelis with European roots have packed up their families in the middle of the night and moved back to Europe where it is safe and where Europe’s leadership doesn’t use them as fall-guys for some real estate grab and their children won’t grow up to be bigots.  I’ve heard that there are more Israelis living in Berlin right now than there were even back in the 1930s.

In an article entitled, “Three Myths of Israel’s Insecurity,” Ira Chernus lists three frequently-told stories that are actually purely myths.  “Myth Number 1:  Israel’s existence is threatened by the ever-present possibility of military attack. In fact, there’s no chance that any of Israel’s neighbors will start a war to wipe out Israel….

“Myth Number 2:  The personal safety of every Jewish Israeli is threatened daily by the possibility of violent attack. In fact, according to Israeli government statistics, since the beginning of 2009 only one Israeli civilian (and two non-Israelis) have been killed by politically motivated attacks inside the green line (Israel’s pre-1967 border).  Israelis who live inside that line go about their daily lives virtually free from such worry.

“Myth Number 3:  Israel’s existence is threatened by worldwide efforts to delegitimize the Jewish state. Early in 2010, Military Intelligence Chief Amos Yadlin told the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, that the country was not ‘suffering from terror or from an immediate military threat.’” http://original.antiwar.com/engelhardt/2011/04/17/the-great.israeli-security-scam/print

 

Now let’s talk about the BDS (Boycott, Divest, Sanction) economic movement worldwide — where both Israeli and American companies who support apartheid are being boycotted.  This movement is putting Israel in more danger than possibilities of violent attack.  And the BDS movement is a direct result of Israel having been influenced by America’s ineffective, weird and immoral foreign policies in the Middle East.  And I have the YouTube flash mob videos to prove it!  

Of course I could continue to cite you cases in point here all night about how Israel’s military, economic and racist policies are failing it bigtime all over the Middle East, and also in the eyes of world opinion, with regard to Israel’s military and foreign policy strategy.  For instance, there’s the case of the new Arab Spring movements that appear to have been originally inspired by Arab hatred of injustice in Palestine.  However, I am more of a philosophical person than a military fact-checker or foreign-policy wank and would prefer to focus on investigating how Israel’s American-inspired-and-funded cruel, unjust and apartheid policies appear to be also destroying Israel from within as well as allegedly from without.

Most practicing Jews — both outside of Israel and inside it — are religious and righteous people who put a heavy emphasis on observing mitzvahs and pursuing justice.  And slowly but surely these practicing Jews are becoming fed up with the vicious persecution of Palestinians that currently makes Israel more resemble Warsaw than the Promised Land.

And not only that, but Israelis have stolen — stolen! — millions of olive trees from Palestinian farmers.  You gotta sink pretty low in order to steal some poor farmer’s olive trees.   Where in the Talmud does it say that olive-tree-stealing is kosher?  Nowhere!

Arab Jews in Israel are also getting fed up with being prejudiced against — even though they are in the majority in Israel.  In an article published recently by a group of Arab Jews in Israel, young Mizrahi Jews stated that, “We believe that, as Mizrahi Jews in Israel, our struggle for economic, social, and cultural rights rests on the understanding that political change cannot depend on the Western powers who have exploited our region and its residents for many generations.” http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/young-arab-jews-open-letter-to-arab-peers.html

Arab Jews are also getting prejudiced against in Israel — remember those famous ringworm experiments that maimed thousands of Jewish children of Arab origin?  The ones where children were irradiated deliberately?  And paid for by America?

It’s not only Christian Arabs and Muslim Arabs that are getting kicked around in Jerusalem.  Arab Jews are getting kicked around there too.  That’s just wrong!

For decades, America has offered Israeli leaders billions and billions of dollars if Israel only will serve as its cats-paws in the Middle East.  And Israeli leaders just hold out their hands, happily selling out their country, willingly corrupted by wealth.

And then there’s that infamous Subaru ad where a Zionist driver thinks it’s just peachy to run over Palestinian children.  Now tell me again how Israelis could have sunk so low morally?  It’s amazing what the power of American money will do when it is waved in your face. 

Just like Americans have been corrupted into believing that killing and maiming hundreds of thousands of women and children in the Middle East is both necessary and cool, Israelis have also sold their birthright as moral human beings in order to serve bogus U.S. foreign policy goals in the Middle East that do NOT serve Israel’s own national interests at all — nor America’s either.

PS:  Here’s a link to an article written by Holocaust survivor Hedy Epstein, “As a Holocaust Survivor, AIPAC Does Not Speak for Me”:  http://www.moveoveraipac.org/2011/04/as-a-holocaust-survivor-aipac-does-not-speak-for-me/ “At the end of one of my first journeys to the Israeli-occupied West Bank in 2004, I endured a shocking experience at Ben-Gurion Airport. I never imagined that Israeli security forces would abuse a 79-year-old Holocaust survivor, but they held me for five hours, and strip-searched and cavity-searched every part of my naked body. The only shame these security officials expressed was to turn their badges around so that their names were invisible….”

Interview with Dr. Fredrick Toben

The only freedom we have in the west is the freedom to go shopping: Dr. Fredrick Toben…

Dr. Fredrick Toben is a unique man. You can find a certain tranquility and serenity in his words and actions which make him an unparalleled academician, author and political analyst. While talking to him, you can make sure that you enjoy a fruitful, comprehensive and informative conversation. He always speaks as if he is in a university classroom and wants to teach something to his students. This is the prominent aspect of his personality. He wants to teach and to learn, as well. He loves sharing new experiences with you, and this is another feature of his personality. He has scientifically denied Holocaust and paid the cost: five times in prison in five countries.

He was born on 2 June 1944, Jaderberg, north Germany, into a farming family, which immigrated to Australian in 1954. His father and mother farmed in Australia. His father died in 2003 and his mother passed away in 2008 while he was serving a three-month prison term for ‘contempt of court’. His parents were married for 63 years.

Toben received his tertiary education in Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Rhodesia-Zimbabwe and he taught secondary and tertiary level German, English, sociology and philosophy in all these countries and Nigeria, as well.

He had a major policy difference with the Victorian Education Department in Melbourne, Australia, which dismissed him from his teaching post on grounds if incompetence and disobedience, and for almost ten years he fought the case and had his dismissal declared invalid.

In 1994, Fredrick Toben founded the Adelaide Institute and became its director. The aim was to research matters relating to ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ and other related ‘taboo topics’ that mainstream research institutes did not dare investigate for fear of financial and social sanction. In 1998 Adelaide Institute held the first-ever Revisionist Symposium in Australia. In 1997 and 1999 he went on a world revisionist fact-finding tour that took him to Eastern Europe in particular to Auschwitz where allegedly millions of Jews were gassed. He found that the technicality of the gassing assertion could not be sustained.

Since 1999, Toben made visits to Iran on a regular basis to attend scientific congresses and news conferences on various social and political issues.

Fredrick Toben joined me in an exclusive interview and talked to me about his viewpoints regarding Iran, the Persian culture, the Islamic solidarity, the impacts of Iran’s Islamic Revolution on the global order and the current position of Iran in the international community.

Here is the complete text of interview with the Australian-German philosopher, Fredrick Toben.

Kourosh Ziabari: You’ve been to Iran several times. What aspect of Iranian culture has attracted you the most? What’s the most striking element of Persian culture in your view?

Fredrick Toben: The first impression is that emotionally I can understand the Iranians. For example, on my first visit to Iran I saw former president Rafsanjani addressing an audience and he was silently crying within as he spoke. I could not understand a word of what he was saying but his words moved me to tears. I felt at home – and on my last day in Tehran on 10 February I walked for an hour looking for a postcard shop, which I found by asking Iranians who did not speak English – somehow I managed to explain what I was looking for. On my way back to the hotel I was walking along the street and a man and woman stopped me. He was holding a large envelope with an address on it. He asked whether I knew where this address was to be found – he asked this in Farsi thinking I was a local Iranian. I then knew I was at home in Iran!

From the feeling world the Iranians move effortlessly into the thinking world and here I recall that the chess game was invented by the Persians, though some say it came from India. Watching Iranian politics of the past decade, I would think the Persians invented the game, something forgotten by the USA that attempts to stop Iranian aspirations for nuclear energy – something that is a natural part of development from oil-based industry to nuclear-electromagnetic industry.

The Iranian people are idealists and this brings them closer to the German mindset that is also idealistic as opposed to the materialistic-based Anglo-American-Zionist international predatory financial mindset, which is currently driving world politics through incessant wars for material resources. It all comes down to a matter of values that flow into a society’s make-up, and Iran still values the basic extended family unit from which the western democracies have been far removed, thereby making individuals vulnerable for personal exploitation.

The basic Iranian hospitality is legendary and I always go on a diet before visiting Iran because eating is such a large part of socializing – and I am getting used to sitting on the floor with my legs crossed, which indicates that flexibility of body is diminished in those who sit on chairs.

Traditional music – instrumental and voice – that develops, merges into contemporary music is so refreshing when compared to what is happening in Western music with its emphasis on noisy rap music. The arts generally are not influenced by the decadent western modern art movement, something that however needs to be watched. Generally, though, most structures are functional and basic without any specific style, though Azadi Tower is a uniquely designed structure.

That I see more often Iranian women with a sticky-tape over their nose indicates a silly vanity is becoming more common place. Also, some women and some men wear too much make-up and dress shabbily in jeans – especially with special-purpose rips at the knee level that is a direct import from the west. This distorts their innate beauty as accentuated through headscarves and hijab where the eyes speak of intelligence rather than superficial beauty. After all, the concept of beauty is more than just skin-deep because it is the soul that creates a person’s beauty. That Iran still has public modesty as a legal term is to be appreciated. The beauty of motherhood and of generational thinking is thereby destroyed and the ‘me’ and ‘I want it know’ generation of consumerism begins as it is operational in the western ‘free and democratic world’. The only freedom we have in the west is the freedom to go shopping.

KZ: As a foreign observer who can take a general look at the lifestyle, culture and the course of daily life in Iran, what’s your overall estimation of the Iranian society? How do you find the Iranian people, their culture, their attitudes and behavior?

FT: Iranians still operate on the generational imperative: if young people have personal problems, which is a normal part of growing up, they can consult with an uncle, an aunt, a cousin, a grandparent, etc. In the west they go to a psychiatrist or psychologist and pay a stranger money for listening to their problems.

KZ: You may admit that the mainstream media, specially the mass media in the United States have so far depicted a lopsided, unfair and unrealistic portrayal of Iran and are incessantly trying to distort the public image of Iran by clinging to stereotypes which are sensitive for the Western citizens, such as Iran’s nuclear program or 1979 hostage crisis. What do you think about the misrepresentation of Iran in the world’s mass media? How is it possible to change this image and introduce the realities of Iran to the world?

FT: Iranians should not worry about what others in the world think of them because that in some sense is a schoolboy reaction, as Arthur Schopenhauer stated: If an enemy criticizes me, I go and see my friends. Iranian politics does have friends and individual Iranians do have friends in the entire world.

All too often Iranians leave their country in search of material comforts in the West – in Los Angeles, in Sydney, for example. Many have a lavish lifestyle but because of the idealistic mindset Iranians when they get older find the materialism superficial and not satisfying their spiritual needs that cannot be satisfied through consumer goods – and alcohol and other drugs can only block out this spiritual need. It is a problem in the west because the secular nature of the consumer society conflicts with Islam because this religion is a comprehensive religion offering a realistic and factual worldview that satisfies basic and spiritual needs.

Politically this expresses itself in the west being controlled by Jewish thinkers who offer atheism to the non-Jews but then they themselves claim to belong to that long Jewish religious tradition. I noted this in my presentation at the 2nd Bioethics conference when I stated that two prominent Bioethicists, Jeremy Rifkin and Peter Singer both claim to be atheists and Jewish who are both set on establishing a materialistic-hedonistic mindset for the non-Jews, basing the premise of their argument on the Holocaust. This makes their whole argument suspect and superficial – and purely subjective where hatred of the German people is the driving force, not any fundamental ethical consideration based on sound philosophical, universal, considerations as made for example by philosopher Immanuel Kant.

KZ: You’re familiar with the Iranian-Islamic concept of the perfection of God. Iranians believe that nothing and nobody is perfect and complete but the Almighty God. What’s your viewpoint in this regard? Does the Western secular society which has long departed from the spiritual and divine values accept this notion?

FT: As above – it is a perpetual human quest for perfection but in the west imperfections are regarded as deficiencies, for example, the beauty industry thrives on suggestions that it is a shame to be getting old, that old age is shameful. This is also evident in the Iranian cosmetic industry where surgery is used. Especially in the USA men and women will subject themselves to surgery for reducing wrinkles in their faces, something that indicates a fear of growing old and of dying. Death in Islam is an accepted notion, as is the ideas of martyrdom, something the west rejects. But in the west countless teenagers suicide because they have no belief in anything except in themselves and in acquiring consumer goods.

The freedom we have in the west is the freedom to self-destruct but not criticize our political system. Pauline Hanson during the 1990s was critical of Australia’s political establishment and founded ONE NATION – and won a number of seats in federal parliament. This threatened the existence of the two-party system, and a pretext was found to have her charged with fraud and imprisoned and this in a democracy!

KZ: Once we were talking together, you mentioned that you admire the sense of decency and modesty which is observable in the Iranian society. What are the features of this decency and is it possible for the Western world to realize it within its current intellectual framework? What makes Iran a modest and decent society that attracts you?

FT: Basic hospitality can be expressed by individuals who feel they are at home within their own country, that they own their country and where patriotism, nationalism is a part of their cultural make-up. In the west we cannot express such ideals because of what happened during World War II when national Socialist Germany lost the war against the ‘freedom and democracy’ advocates of atheistic predatory capitalism. Australia and other western countries are now registered in the USA as a business – nation states now have a business number!

Personal modesty, as expressed within Iranian society, gives the individual much more room to be attuned to another person because it requires sensitivity – empathetic understanding to communicate within such delicate process. I always find that I at times lock this sensitivity because in the west it is the pushy person who gets things done, etc.

The bedrock on which my enquiring actions rests is an aim to get to the truth of a matter. It is a weaving action that in time produces wonderful carpets of truth. In the west the younger generation does not have the patience for this because the profit-driven consumer society requires that instant gratification be pursued so that consumption continues to grow. This is a physical thing that does not accept the truth that the mind develops and unfolds and only slowly develops at its own pace.

To date it has not been possible to enhance mind functions but western consumerism aims to find a pill that will solve every human problem – I call this the search for the comprehensive happiness pill: it is invisible and you take it every morning! Of course, such thinking about happiness is merely a search for finding a home within one’s own mind, something a belief in God makes superfluous, and Islam does this comprehensively by offering a universal approach to ‘happiness’ without swallowing pills!

The trouble at the moment with sanctions is that Iranians are excluded from cutting-edge scientific research. But I still think Iranians will manage, as indicated by the fact that petroleum production is now satisfying the local markets. To think that Iran did not have its own refineries until recent times is a shameful legacy of colonialism where a ruling elite permits such exploitation of his own people. The Egyptian uprising, hopefully and God willing, will see an end to Egyptian exploitation – and perhaps they can learn something from Iran. After all, the Egyptian president abdicated during the 32nd Iran Revolution Anniversary celebrations, which is significant.

So, softly-softly politics is an Iranian hallmark, but I hasten to add that is only possible because someone is physically protecting the people from external aggressors that want to dismantle Iranian progress. Were it not for the Revolutionary Guard, for example, then the external influence would have easily seen a return to violence and foreign corruption operating within Iranian society. The Moussavi movement, though well-meaning and convincing was still funded by the US which managed to pour millions of dollars – openly – into Iranian society. It is now a trying time for all Iranians because the dialectic set by the US on 11 September 2001 that declared the Islamic world a terrorist world, religion is not holding up because it is based on a lie. The western world operates on a freedom and democracy where criminal gangs have a free reign and where the police and the criminal world manage society, and where sensitive individuals have a hard time protecting their cultural endeavors and ideals.

KZ: In our previous discussions, you mentioned that Iran shouldn’t rely on the foreign tourists to come here, see the realities on the ground and return to their homeland and change the prevailing mindset of the Western society about Iran. You mentioned that what the others say about us is not important. Would you please elaborate on this?

FT: I meant that too many countries rely on tourism as an industry of their own economy as is the case, for example, in a number of South East Asian countries. This tourism is often blatant sex-based tourism, which destroys the cultural heritage of a people.

It is important for a citizen to feel at home first, and that can be done by the young Iranians traveling overseas, exposing themselves to the world, then returning home. This is what I did as a young man when I traveled the world and wherever I stopped I also continued my studies. It is in this way that I, with a German background, stumbled on to the Holocaust lies and found that Iranians had an open mind in this matter. This meant that Iran was also not afraid of Jewish pressure and so do its own thing.

The nuclear development issue is merely highlighting the western world’s hypocrisy in this matter, especially because the Zionist regime in Israel has a highly developed program of constructing especially mini-nuclear weapons that have been used in a number of ‘false-flag’ operations around the world.

It means nothing to receive praise/acceptance from countries where predatory capitalism has destroyed the lives of millions, for example in the USA where 20 million hopes are empty because of the mortgage crisis. Such anti-Iran sentiments are media generated and the world media is in few hands, and they are mostly Jewish-owned. In fact, if you analyze the anti-Iran push in the world, at the US you find it is always done by proxy for Israel: Isra-hell!

KZ: Iran has just celebrated the 32nd anniversary of its Islamic Revolution. What are in your view, the social and political impacts of this revolution on the international community? How did it change the political equations and orders of the world? What was the message of this revolution to the Western and Eastern superpowers?

FT: The basic message is one that the western peoples are so degenerate that it is impossible to have a people uprising. Sex, drugs, rock’n roll is the message.

The recent financial breakdown of western global institutions has caused untold misery to millions of individuals who have lost their job, their home and their families. The suggestion is always that it is the individual’s fault that such a catastrophe has come about and the financial system’s inherent flaws are not corrected. That is what I personally fight against – and that is what Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists fought against. The Jewish Holocaust issue is a story designed to deflect from this predatory capitalist phenomenon. Iran is at this stage now in its development and is thus a threat to this international capitalist system, as is Zimbabwe and other nations that refuse to be enslaved to the IMF and World Bank in this never-ending cycle of debt finance.

The concept is Autarky where self-sufficiency for a nation is the goal. This stands in stark contrast to the many multinational corporations who hate nothing more than a national sovereign state, as is the Islamic Republic of Iran. Many of these multinationals are pharmaceutical firms whose budget is larger than some of the media-sized countries. The USA has been buying influence for decades and we saw this in Egypt that received billions of grants annually from the USA – and what happened to this money? The ruling elite placed it into Swiss bank accounts, etc.

Iran has been successful in its endeavors and now has also brought Turkey on-side, thereby swinging it away from Europe. But the largest problem is faced with the existence of the Zionist military state of Israel that seeks to dominate the Middle East without any dissent. Here Iran can

make the Middle East a safe haven by working towards the dismantling of this racist state – and if it does not succeed, then the Middle East will be dominated by Jewish interests – and such interests are based on TALMUD values, and that is a horrifying prospect for all peoples.

KZ: Following the 1979 revolution which ousted the U.S.-backed Shah of Iran, the Western countries, led by the United States, entered an altercation with Iran and directed spates of psychological operations and financial sanctions against it. How did Iran succeed in surviving these threats? What are the results of the crippling sanctions which have been imposed on Iran so far?

FT: My contacts in Iran assure me that sanctions have helped economic self-sufficiency in Iran. In any case everything is available but it all costs more – everything except the super computer!

Iranian diplomacy is delicate and so Iran has many friends in the world – more than Israel has!

Iran has also through various conferences looked at and invited dissenting voices from around the world and gathered information from diverse peoples – then matched this information with what is at home. For example during the recent Philosophy Congress it became evident that Holy

Quran can easily stand against the opinions expressed in psychology texts, hermeneutics, etc.

One effect that is creating a false consciousness within Iranians is that the west is better and that we have more freedom. This is why it is a good idea to send young Iranians overseas so that they can evaluate for themselves what they find. Many will fall into the traps set by consumerism and fail to resist hedonistic inversion tendencies, for example. But such matters have also run their course in the western democracies where now homosexual couples, male and female, want to set up families, thereby giving lie to the fact that their life-style is a better and more fulfilling one.

KZ: You have traveled to several countries around the world and experienced different cultures and civilizations firsthand. What’s the most remarkable difference of Iranian culture with the other cultures in the world? What separates Iran from the other countries and cultures?

FT: Iranian’s still have a modesty concept and family values that have not been destroyed by the so-called post-modernity value system where there is no home for a God, where sense-gratification is the order of the day, where money rules supreme and no other values find in-depth expression.

Of course I relate to the Iranian people because they still have an emotional openness and are idealistic in their value system, much like the German people and unlike the peoples coming from countries influenced by empiricism and capitalistic consumerism and driven by class thinking, which is an expression of false consciousness at its best!

KZ: Iran is ethnically a diverse society. Several ethnic groups live all around Iran with distinctive languages, cultures, rituals and customs. We have Azeri, Turk, Baluch, Gilak, Kurd, Lor and Turkmen in Iran and this is a miracle. What do you think about this ethnic diversity in Iran?

FT: Multicultural societies operate on a fraudulent principle of equality. Any viable society must have as dominant cultural framework. In Australia we have multiculturalism but because 70% is still Anglo-Australian there is no danger of disintegration. Germany and France turned their mono-culture into multicultural states and it has now been accepted that it has been a failure for the Germans and the French.

I say multiculturalism is a fraud because in Australia various ethnic groups are supported through government grants and elaborate multicultural structures are developed. But once an ethnic person reaches the top of the multicultural tree, he has to begin anew when joining mainstream society.

Iranians are fortunate in that they have a unifying principle in the form of Islam that enables them to keep expressing their ethnic diversity without threatening the unity of Iran. In Australia we have a secular state where that unifying principle is not developed and then is often labeled ‘racist’ by the ethnics, especially when Jewish interests in Australia are threatened. As former Prime minister of Malaysia, Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, noted, the Jews run the  world by proxy, and it is in their interest to continue to advocate multiculturalism wherever they have an influence – except, of course, in Israel!

Knowledge and Foolishness

Ignoring Reality…

Good jugglers keep several balls in the air at one time.  Islam is only one of the religious balls that impact our society and the only one in the air.  Our religious editorials are wretched.

A friend recently urged me to read an editorial by Brian Kennedy, President of the Claremont Institute.   The editorial was distributed by Hillsdale College in a regular mailing of their bulletin “Imprimis”.  

Kennedy begins his essay by supporting this tragic misconception: “Whereas Christianity teaches that we should render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s—allowing for a non-theocratic politi­cal tradition to develop in the West, culmi­nating in the principles of civil and religious liberty in the American founding—Islam teaches that to disagree with or even reinterpret the Koran’s 6000 odd verses, organized into 114 chapters or Suras and dealing as fully with law and politics as with matters of faith, is punishable by death.”

In addition to the emphasis on Islam the essay correctly points to the dangers posed by China and Russia and rattles the swords for a more complete defensive posture.  It ends with this statement:  “Americans do not wish to be subjected to Sharia law, owe large sums of money to the Chinese, or be kept vulnerable to nuclear missiles. Having responded resoundingly to the economic and constitutional cri­sis represented by Obamacare, it is now time for us to remind our representatives of the constitutional requirement to pro­vide for a common defense—in the true sense of the word.”

This is an acceptable mainstream Conservative polemic that is based on some assumptions that are dangerously false.  The first and most dangerous assumption is that the power that controls our nation wants it to grow and prosper.  Kennedy’s essay seems to assume some authority will hear and be influenced to change debilitating programs.  I believe the assumption is false and because it is false it is dangerous.  America is being destroyed on purpose.  Multiculturalism, homosexuality, and endless war are all constant and are all debilitating.  The socialistic programs begun by President Franklin Roosevelt have grown like a cancer.  The eradication of real Christianity from the public square has devastated our moral standards. GATT, NAFTA, and CAFTA are stealing our industrial base and lowering our standard of living.   Economic dislocations created by the Federal Reserve are reducing our former middle class to paupers and support for Israel has seriously distorted our National interests.  All this is being done on purpose!

Kennedy excoriates Sharia law but does not mention Judaism and the Talmud.  Wealthy Zionist Jews, many of them Talmudist, control higher education, own all of our media and a large portion of our industry.  These wealthy and powerful men have inordinate power over our nation.  They are responsible for the makeup of our congress and the votes of its members.  They successfully promote multiculturalism, homosexuality, fornication, torture, humanism, and war.  They are internationalists and promoters of world government.  They consider themselves racially superior and attend to Talmudic principles.  These are some of the worst:

“If a ‘goy’ (Gentile) hits a Jew he must be killed.” (Sanhedrin 58b)

“If a Jew finds an object lost by a ‘goy’ it does not have to be returned.” (Baba Mezia 24a)

“If a Jew murders a ‘goy’ there will be no death penalty.” (Sanhedrin 57a)

What a Jew steals from a ‘goy’ he may keep.” (Sanhedrin 57a)

“Jews may use subterfuges to circumvent a ‘goy.’” (Baba Kamma 113a)

“All children of the ‘goyim’ (Gentiles) are animals.” (Yebamoth 98a)

“Girls born of the ‘goyim’ are in a state of ‘niddah’ (menstrual uncleanness!) from birth.” (Abodah Zarah 36b)

Read about their involvement in the homosexual movement here.

Islam is competitor to Christianity.  It is winning the battle because Christianity has been so badly denuded that it no longer competes.  Judaism and Zionism with support from hoards of delusional Evangelicals has succeeded in banning Christianity and filling society with pornography.  Islam is dangerous but it is a pimple compared with the cancer of Zionism.

If you are a Christian please consider the implications of Kennedy’s contention that “Whereas Christianity teaches that we should render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s—allowing for a non-theocratic politi­cal tradition to develop in the West, culmi­nating in the principles of civil and religious liberty in the American founding –“

“Civil and religious liberty” is a problem, not a solution.  It is civil and religious liberty that has allowed Talmudic Jews and other anti-Christian zealots to invade our political system, highjack our morals, and decimate our culture.  Christianity cannot exist under humanistic government.  Humanistic laws will force Christians to act as pagans or kill them in the process.   A nation cannot be Christian under a secular government and Christians cannot receive God’s blessing while obeying sinful laws.  Brian Kennedy misinterprets the phrase, “Whereas Christianity teaches that we should render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s.”  Jesus did not intend to set part of His Father’s creation under the control of sinful men.  Everything belongs to God (including Caesar and the government in Rome) and everything should be under His control.

Please understand that Islam, China, and Russia are all potential enemies of the United States and Brian Kennedy has done a fine job of pointing this out.  However, his efforts are useless since he has not identified their role in the evil scheme of the shadowy elite cabal that seeks to control the world.

I know it is hard to believe but it is time we woke up.  Western society is being dismantled.  It is being gutted like the corporate raiders used to gain control and gut wealthy corporations, robbing their wealth, and leaving them bankrupt.  The men behind this power grab are evil men and the organizations they belong to are evil organizations.

President Eisenhower spoke about the military/industrial complex.  Have you tried to get one of these huge, international corporations to correct a problem with one of their products?  Nine chances out of ten you will spend hours providing useless information on their internet site or an equal amount of time trying to find the phone number that will connect you to a life person.  If you are patient enough to get connected and able to understand Indian tech reps you might get a small amount of help but you will never get a replacement or get your money back.  I believe the Toyota brake debacle was a tempest in a teapot but if Toyota had properly concluded the problem with the individuals involved it would never have gotten out of control.  International corporations have secured enough monopoly power to exert considerable control over their customers.  They, like government, are interested in money and power not in pleasing an individual customer.

Kennedy fails to indict the government for allowing Muslims to immigrate in to our country and to point out that our Constitution makes it perfectly legal for them to be involved in our government and to support Shiria law as long as it does not conflict with their oath to support the Constitution.  Come on Christians, address that issue!  We are living in a nation where the religion of humanism is encoded in our founding document.  It is not specified but by forbidding the establishment of an overarching deity our Founders made humanism the sole legal religion of the United States of America.  Humanism makes a god of the creature and since our Constitution forbids the establishment of a specific overarching authority and forbids a religious oath, in creates humanism by default.  It does exactly what Kennedy says; it creates “civil and religious liberty” which allows all religions, including Islam, to be involved in our government.

He writes that “Islam teaches that to disagree with or even reinterpret the Koran’s 6000 odd verses, organized into 114 chapters or Suras and dealing as fully with law and politics as with matters of faith, is punishable by death.”  Kennedy does not seem to realize that death for disagreement is common in many religions.  Humanistic governments had killed millions of citizens who disagreed with their policies.   Along with some fifteen other infractions the Bible provides the death penalty for blasphemy, false doctrines, and sacrificing to false gods.  The methods of execution are burning, stoning, beheading, and hanging.  Attempts to create a religious void are futile.  The ultimate authority of any society is the god of that society.  If Christianity is not specified another religion will take its place!

All religions are exclusive.  Humanism is a religion and it is in the process of stamping out Christianity in the free world.  Christianity has already been repeatedly mocked, distorted, and discredited in the media.  Humanistic Jews, who consider themselves the master race, treat Christians the way Hitler, who considered Germans the master race, treated Jews. That should be a warning to Christians.

Hillsdale College is a pseudo-Christian institution that picks and chooses what portions of the Bible they will endorse.  They do not understand the exclusive nature of Christianity, Islam, and Humanism and without that understanding neither they nor Brian Kennedy can provide a proper defense.

Revolution Against Central Banks

Nothing is more destructive on the planet than the insidious enslavement of humanity at the hands of central banks. The concept of debt created money violates every axiom of logic and common sense. Self-interest should be a primordial instinctive drive. Christendom once condemned usury through a papal prohibition that it was a sin to charge interest on a money loan. The Qur’an teaches, “The usury that is practiced to increase some people’s wealth, does not gain anything at God”. However, the Hebrew Bible makes an exception, Deuteronomy 23:21 “Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest”.

Where is the self-interest of the masses that accepts the ruthless theft from the ultimate crime? The helplessness of individuals to resist the cabal of greed is obvious. The literal acceptance of rabbinical Talmudic opportunism is the basis of central banking deception. Let’s be perfectly clear, When Victims Rule provides the contrast.

“The vast gap between Christian and Jewish moral perspectives, per materialist self-aggrandizement, is evidenced everywhere in their respective traditions. In the Christian New Testament, for instance, Jesus enjoined values of humility and modesty to his followers, teaching that “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of heaven.” [LUKE 18-25] Jewish religious tradition stands in drastic opposition. The [Talmudic] Mishnah, for instance, proclaims, “Who is rich? He who enjoys his wealth.” Likewise, there is no equivilant in Jewish mainstream tradition to Christian vows of poverty and material abstinence”.

Who created the sham of central banking? What is the justification to create money and charge interest for its use? Even more offensive, how were governments swindled into allowing private monopolies the function of loaning fiat money (produced by a ledger entry) to the State? What became of state sovereignty? The notion that a central bank demands an obligation from the government to allow money placed into circulation is not only absurd but is hideous.

The history of central banking is well defined. The refusal to focus on the controllers of the world’s money hoax is a requirement to engage in meaningful commerce. Governments serve central banks. The banksters share the iniquity of the Khazari tradition. The rest of us are all foreigners to the cult of the Tempter.

Escalate the deception from the personal level to the community of nations. The recent G 20 fiasco in Seoul illustrates that the scheme to subjugate countries under the bonds of phony debt is getting old.  explains well the laws of economics

Asians are blessed from being condemned to the insane victim devotion that Western culture has sunk in the last century. The poor bankers worship in their hedge fund temples. Governments beg for sustenance from the synagogue of quantitative easement.

One can never fault for a lack of creativity, such a nasty trick. Foreigners will pay the highest price and brothers will get relief from the policy benefits that are always a condition for allowing governments to borrow additional phantom money. A nice gig if you can get it for a tribe of respectable merchants from the Venetian heritage.

Enough is enough! The global free trade/transnational economic plague all depends upon rolling over higher levels of debt that accrue more interest for the privately owned banking cartels. This larceny is not natural, but the evil nature of the banksters is genetic. Central banking based upon debt created money must be eliminated. Sounds radical but this requirement is entirely traditional, at least for civilizations that foster a meaningful degree of state and individual sovereignty.

The author Eustace Mullins is the definitive source on the SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE – The London Connection. His video  is a must view. His recent passing does not diminish the force of his analysis.

A perceptive article Monetary Gold, SDR’s and the BIS explains the following,

“The official currency unit of the Bank for International Settlements itself is the SDR. The BIS, of course, and its member central banks and private individuals/corporations (until they were bought out in 2001) is the father of the IMF. The BIS also holds “Investment Accounts” or IA’s for the IMF since 2005. These are international loans and investments that the IMF pays the BIS to run. The SDR itself took the position as official unit of the BIS from no other than the gold* Swiss franc in 2003 (*more on that shortly). As we know, the SDR’s are “a potential claim on the freely usable currencies of IMF members”–55 of which are subject to the central banks that own the BIS.

This is how it works: the BIS is creating up SDR’s. The BIS is taking national currency deposits from the 55 member/owner central banks and converting them to SDR’s on its own balance sheet. The SDR’s are “claims on the freely usable currencies of IMF members,” therefore, the deposits of the central banks become claims on those currencies–the deposits of the fiat central banks who can deposit as much as they feel at the BIS in whatever currency the chose–including the SDR’s allotted to their “nation,” as the central banks are the sole depositories for the national wealth/sellers of the national debt. The BIS is then paying out dividends to these same member CB’s in the form of SDR’s, which again can be used to claim currencies. By August 2009, they had just made up out of thin air almost twelve times the supposed global supply of SDR’s. They are truly acting like the “central bank of the world,” complete with printing!”

The significance is that a modified SDR with an unredeemable (for individuals) gold backing component as a substitute for currency recalls is being floated out as an alternative for the failed Federal Reserve IOU Note. All the time the underlying debt obligation would just be rolled over into a new dodge to keep the Ponzi scheme afloat. How is this ploy any different from Shakespeare’s quid-essential money-monger?

SHYLOCK: The Merchant of Venice | Act I, Scene III

This kindness will I show:

Go with me to a notary, seal me there

Your single bond; and, in a merry sport,

If you repay me not on such a day,

In such a place, such sum, or sums, as are

Express’d in the condition, let the forfeit

Be nominated for an equal pound

Of your fair flesh, to be cut off and taken

In what part of your body pleaseth me.

This is the essence of central banking. It uses debt created money to rob societies, manipulate economies and maintain perpetual indebtedness. Human bondage is permanent under the reign of loan shark banking dynasties. Apply this same standard against the central banks, but instead of settling for a mere pound, set your sights at repossessing the wealth of generations stolen from the labor and ingenuity of freemen by the cabal of iniquity.

Combating this global gulag demands bold and inventive resistance. Break away from all financial instruments. Get out of debt; everyone is already in a virtual bankruptcy. Convert into real assets that have liquidity outside the banking system. Reduce your expenditures, increase your savings and lower your taxable income, while building up bartered reserves. Hard times are here and will get only worse, prepare as time allows.Governments are subservient to money dominance as long as they accept the central banking illusion that money can only be issued under a debt obligation paid to bankers. The remaining few thinking individuals are able to understand this basic principle. Politicians dispel this wisdom, economists apologize for fractional reserve banking and the average taxpayer sinks deeper in debt – personally and as a citizen of their country of residence.

War is the favored tool of the oligopoly financial magicians. They set the wheels in motion to detract from economic collapse when the sheeple have no more wool to shear. They build even higher, the debt corridor under the guise of national survival. How quaint! This formula works well and serves to consolidate the money moguls design on planetary serfdom.

Revolution against the financial banking houses combats the enslavers. The House of Rothschild is more than a symbol; it is a curse on civilization. A revolt against central banking masters is the redress mission that humanity requires to unleash individual dignity and economic freedom. Take back national sovereignty with the repudiation of the illicit debt and issue constitutional U.S. Dollar specie. This is a moral war, which needs to be fought . . .

“The Rothschilds, and that class of money-lenders of whom they are the representatives and agents – men who never think of lending a shilling to their next-door neighbors, for purposes of honest industry, unless upon the most ample security, and at the highest rate of interest – stand ready, at all times, to lend money in unlimited amounts to those robbers and murderers, who call themselves governments, to be expended in shooting down those who do not submit quietly to being robbed and enslaved“. Lysander Spooner

“The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered“. Thomas Jefferson

Lieberman and the Jewish Political Continuum

Following Israeli FM Avigdor Lieberman’s address at the UN last week, Aluf Benn wrote (1)  in Haaretz:

“During the past few weeks, Netanyahu invested a great deal of effort in trying to convince the leaders of the world that he is serious about peace with the Palestinians. He asked them to ignore the resumption of settlement construction, and convinced Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas not to quit the negotiations.

Now comes Lieberman, Israel’s most senior diplomat, and tells all those leaders that… Netanyahu is faking. Even worse: the foreign minister is implying that Netanyahu’s demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state is merely cover for the expulsion of Arab citizens.”

Netanyahu, Barak and many other Israelis are often  ‘outraged’ by  FM Lieberman. I guess that Israelis grasp that their senior diplomat  exposes the Israeli ploy: when Israelis talk peace — what they really mean is war with no end.  When Israeli government spokesmen insist that Lieberman “misrepresents Israeli Government’s policies” — what they really mean is that he fails to repeat the Israeli official lies.  As it stands, Lieberman’s UN speech few days ago, conveys not only Israeli cabinet vision, it is also a devastating glimpse into the Israeli mindset, worldview and spirit. Lieberman is a transparent image of the Israeli desire for racial and cultural homogeneity. Many Israelis claim to detest him and his ideas: but my guess is that they grasp that Lieberman is actually their true mirror. Otto Weininger wrote in “Sex & Character” that people hate in others that which they detest in themselves. Many Israelis ostensibly oppose Lieberman because he reminds them of the bigot whom they can’t stand in themselves. Some people do not like to look in the mirror; others are devastated when the mirror gazes back at them with pity.

“We, the Israelis are united”, Lieberman told the UN assembly (2) , “now we have a stable coalition, stable government and we have the support of a majority of Israel’s citizens.”  Lieberman is obviously correct: the Israelis are now more united than ever. In fact, there is no political opposition in Israel except from the Arab parties.  Yet, “we are not ready to compromise our national security or the vital interests of the State of Israel” Lieberman continued.

This says it all : unlike the rest of humanity who regard the concept of peace as a means towards reconciliation and harmony,  for Lieberman — and in fact for  every Israeli politician I can think of —  the word ‘peace’ only translates as ‘security for the Jews’

Lieberman is no fool. Unlike the Israeli so called ‘peace camp’ who rally for Israeli withdrawal to pre-1967 lines, the Israeli Foreign minister knows that occupation alone is not the root of the problem. He also understands that a further Israeli withdrawal won’t significantly change anything. Rather, Lieberman fully understands that the right of return is actually at the heart of the Palestinian cause, yet he is not willing to discuss it. Instead, Lieberman insists that “recognition of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people” is of the essence, because he basically wants Israel to be a ‘Jews only’ club.  And it is crucial to admit here, that this point is also totally vital for Israelis and Zionist Jews around the world too.

But here, there is a shocking twist: whilst we understand that Zionists insist on operating within a ‘Jews only’ club — the Jewish anti Zionists are apparently not much different. For some reason, the Jewish opponents of Israel also insist on operating in what seem to be just more Judeo-centric tribal dissident political cells.  It is pretty obvious that the ‘Jewish boat to Gaza’ was a Jews only vessel.  I can only assume that ‘Jews for Peace’,  ‘Jews for Palestine’, and ‘Jews against Zionism’ are then, all simply different exercises in a Jewish national and tribal politics  that is also racially orientated, or, at the very least ethno centric. For some reason ‘Political Jews’ do not like to mix with others, whether it is the Likud party, ‘Yisrael Beiteinu or ‘Jews for Peace in Palestine’.

Lieberman was actually totally honest in the UN when he admitted: “we should focus on coming up with a long-term intermediate agreement, something that could take a few decades.” It is completely obvious that the Israelis are not ready for peace.  It may, indeed, take decades before they encompass the notion of harmony and reconciliation. One may also wonder at this stage, if the Jewish left is any different? How many years will it take before ‘Jews for Peace’ understand that solidarity with Palestine is a universal humanitarian cause? Is not 200 hundred years of Jewish assimilation* enough time for Jews to join the battle for humanism as ordinary participants?  I myself would love to believe that even a day is more than enough. Clearly the facts suggests otherwise.

Lieberman admits that “the guiding principle for a final status agreement must not be land-for-peace but rather, exchange of populated territory”. This idea obviously appeals to most Israelis — because it emphasizes and expresses the true meaning of a Jewish affinity towards segregation.

Embarrassingly enough, this affinity toward isolation is also inherent within the Jewish left. On the one hand, we have the Global BDS Movement (Boycott, Divestment and Sanction for Palestine) (3), a movement driven by a universal and ethical call to boycott Israeli Goods — yet on the other hand we have also the  J-BIG (Jews For Boycotting Israeli Good) (4) who rally for the exact same cause — but would accept Jews only.  For some reason, even the  ‘good Jews’ ( those who  oppose Israel and Zionism ) refuse to share political space with the Goyim. One may also wonder at this stage,  how can anyone ‘boycott as a Jew’? What is implied by this ethno centric political call? Do they really refuse to buy Caterpillar  boots or Motorola phones — ‘as Jews’?   I was a Jew for the first four decades of my life, and I somehow, never managed to do a single thing  solely and exclusively ‘as a Jew’.

Along the years I have challenged a few secular Jewish anti Zionists : I ask them   why do they insist on operating politically as Jews — especially considering the fact  that they  claim to be secular, or even atheist? What do they actually mean then, when they say, ‘as a Jew I support X or oppose Y’.  I have never yet heard an answer that was decent enough to report.

I am afraid that Lieberman is brave enough to provide an answer :  He does speak ‘as a Jew,’ and it seems he is at least consistent and coherent, though somewhat deluded. Expressing it as ‘historical truth’, he speaks of “almost 4000 years during which the Jewish People were born in the Land of Israel, while developing the corpus of ethical and intellectual treasures that have been instrumental in giving rise to Western Civilization.” Lieberman goes on to claim that “2000 years of forced exile, and interim conquest by Byzantines, Arabs, Mamelukes, Ottomans and others, cannot, and never will, impair the unbreakable bonds of the Jewish People to its homeland. Israel is not only where we are. It is who we are.”

Evidently, Lieberman regards the Bible as a historical text. He believes in a Jewish continuum. He seems to consider that the Old Testament’s ‘eye for an eye’ is the spiritual foundation  of Western Civilization.  He is obviously wrong : he is probably not familiar enough with Athens. Lieberman also fails to realize that Jesus’ preaching for universal brotherhood was actually an attempt to counter, revise and amend Hebraic tribalism.

Yet, Lieberman  is at least crystal clear in his vision. He believes  in an ‘eternal bond’ between  ‘spirit’ and geography: Israel is not ‘just where we are’ — it is also ‘who we are’. This statement is actually crucial for an understanding of what is assumed by Zionists to be a ‘magical’ power inherent within their world view.

However, Lieberman is clearly misinformed — a brief reading of Shlomo Sand’s The Invention of the Jewish People would help him trace his Khazarian ancestors. And yet, Lieberman  is at least articulate . His identity assumes meaning, because it cements Jewish contemporary existence with Talmudic supremacy.  It sets out to frame the ‘here and now’ within an historical context.   It bonds the current robbery of Palestine with a very similar Biblical tale of plunder.  I guess that these facts alone explain why Lieberman is a major political player in the Jewish state.  It also explains why the Israeli government followed and approved his demand for a ‘Loyalty oath’ to the Jewish state.

If we want to understand Jewish political identity; If we want to understand the depth of Israeli belief in racial supremacy (or alternatively why nine brave Jews insist on breaking the siege on Gaza in a ‘Jews only’ yacht),   Lieberman is a key figure. It is actually Lieberman the right wing hawk who helps us to understand the insular ‘Jews for Palestine’, J-BIG and  J- Street.

Lieberman is becoming more and more popular amongst Jews and Israelis. He is a key member in the Israeli coalition.  Jewish anti Zionism, on the other hand, is far from being popular amongst the Jewish masses.  If we talk in terms of numbers, it is not even marginal. True, it is loud, occasionally verging on noisy, but it is far from being clear about what it is trying to achieve.  It is inconsistent and still apparently founded on a misleading myth of ‘Jewish universal and ethical tradition’.  The truth of the matter though, is devastating: There is no coherent Jewish secular value system;  instead, there are just different modes of Jewish political exceptionalisms.

For some peculiar reason, the Jewish left refuses to intermingle within the rest of the solidarity movement.  Instead of grasping, once and for all, the true dynamic meaning of universalism, pluralism and ethics, it is there to exchange symbolism. ‘We want to show’, they seem to be saying, ‘that there are some good Jews around’.

I guess however, that Jewish leftists are too intellectually lame to grasp that such a statement is actually the ultimate form of anti Jewish racism : because  it says to the world that ‘the rest of the Jews’ are indeed, little more than reactionary Zionists.

It refers to ‘the rest of the Jews’ then, as a non ethical collective.

I do realize that many of us detest Lieberman, but the truth must be said — the Israeli Foreign Minister is an eloquent glimpse into contemporary Jewish politics and identity politics.

(1) http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/aluf-benn-lieberman-is-making-a-liar-out-of-netanyahu-1.316270

(2) http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Speeches+by+Israeli+leaders/2010/FM_Liberman_Addresses_UN_General_Assembly_28-Sep-2010.htm

(3) http://bdsmovement.net/

(4) http://www.bigcampaign.org/index.php?page=jbig

* On September 29, 1791, France became the first country in the world to emancipate its Jewish population. By 1796, Britain, and the Netherlands had granted the Jews equal rights with gentiles. Napoleon also freed the Jews in areas he conquered. By the beginning of the 20^th century Jews were emancipated throughout Europe. And yet, for some reason, Jewish left has failed to assimilate. It operates as an exclusive political cell.

Israel Will Be Palestine

A meeting between Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and Israeli deputy foreign minister Danny Ayalon ended abruptly yesterday. The dispute followed the Israeli deputy foreign minister’s demand that the meeting’s summary should refer to the notion of ‘two states for two peoples,’ rather than just ‘two states.’

“I wanted that at the very least it will note two states for two peoples. I demanded to know what they meant. One Palestinian state and one bi-national state, or another Palestinian state?” the deputy minister told Ynet. “I made it clear that we were out of the picture if the summary didn’t say two states for two peoples.”

The Palestinian PM could not accept such a demand for very many reasons: Israel is located on historic Palestine. It came to life through robbery and ethnic cleansing. It is maintained by theft. At least a fifth of Israel’s population are Palestinians. And if this is not enough, not a single living Palestinian negotiator is ever going to let the refugee issue go, and for a good reason. The right of return is still the crux of the Palestinian cause.

Interestingly enough, within the context of the two states solution, a Palestinian state would be geographically defined: it would be a state of its citizens, and it would also be a civilised amalgam of different ethnicities and religions.  Israel, on the other hand, would be a racially orientated setting: it would be the Jewish State, where Jews come first. I wonder why anyone in the international community would support such a solution or such a state. However, I wasn’t surprised to read in Ynet that Tony Blair, who participated in the earlier part of the meeting yesterday, “supported the Israeli stance”. I guess that after dragging us all into a religious war with no end, Blair has developed an affinity with Judeo-centric arguments and the Zionist way of thinking.  After all, let’s not forget, it was Zionist Lord Levy and the Labour Friends of Israel who funded his party at the time it launched the war in Iraq.

It also shouldn’t take us by surprise that the current rounds of talks are leading nowhere. In fact, given that Zionism does not include peaceful political precepts, the Israel-Palestine conflict cannot be resolved by the current peace talks or any kind of resolution dominated by the Zionist world view . The Jewish state presents itself as a revival of the Biblical Israelite nation,  and this means in practice, a disastrous conflict with no end. This conflict is probably the greatest threat for world peace,  but it is certainly tragic also for Israelis who are  being born into a doomed reality set by a phantasmic Biblical tale.

In the meeting, Ayalon said that “Israel will continue to support the Palestinian economy, even without its consent”, but he also noted that “Israel’s security needs must also be taken into consideration”. Instead of being motivated by a sincere desire for peace and a spirit of reconciliation, Israeli policy makers are committed to the philosophy of  ‘carrot and stick’ : they offer a combination of ‘rewards’ and ‘punishment’ to induce ‘good subservient behaviour’ amongst the Palestinians. The Palestinians are constantly offered very little while at the same time, the IDF is ready to unleash its deadly might. Israelis are basically  buying time, yet, by doing so, they clearly sacrifice their future. It is no secret that for Palestinians to win, all they need is time.

The ‘two states solution’ is a futile idea and it is about time the International community stopped wasting any effort in trying to achieve such a resolution. The facts on the ground are clear, as Daniel McGowan  clearly suggested a few months ago:

“Within the current borders controlled by Israel (including pre-1967 Israel, the West Bank, Gaza and the Golan Heights) there is in fact a single state. It has one electrical grid, one water system, one currency, one major highway system, one postal service, and one external border. Goods and people entering this de facto state come through harbors, airports, and a restricted number of crossings. Bills of lading and passports are checked and stamped by officials of this single state.”
This one state is momentarily called Israel, and it is dominated ideologically by Jewish racism and fuelled practically by Talmudic supremacy. However, this will change. Against all odds, the Israeli nuclear power, Jewish lobbies around the world, F-35 stealth planes and Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister’s enthusiasm, Israel will become a state of its citizens and by the time this happens, it will be called Palestine.

By Way of Deception, We Shall do War

Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) said, “The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.” ¹ Worldwide control obviously requires extraordinary organization, superior weaponry and high technology (like HAARP), political power and monopoly control of all the resources. On February 17, 1950, James P. Warburg declared to the U.S. Senate, “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” ² In Russia and China and other countries, the elite used thugs for their violent conquest of existing leaders.

Populations wouldn’t knowingly consent to their own demise. But distracted, naïve, ignorant citizens, by their consent, relinquish their liberties by placing their trust in others, (1) two-faced lying politicians who have abandoned the constitution and sold their souls and, (2) the persuasive profit-driven elite media. Smiling talking heads and brilliant, fast-talking female lawyers in low-cut garments legitimize immodesty while peddling infotainment disguised as news. They equivocate among themselves over the Neocon’s next war target which they claim is necessary to keep America safe. While selling their illusions and building our perceptions, what to wear, eat, drink, think and who to fear, they conceal, suppress or gloss over stories that are actually pertinent to our lives.

Jacob H. Schiff, Paul Warburg and other bankers influenced Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act (December 23, 1913). The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was created in October 1913 to minimize predictable criticism. The bankers have manufactured panics, withdrawn credit and in the process have confiscated the citizen’s resources and personal property through phony bailouts, sanctioned by compromised politicians. These actions are calculated and designed to ultimately decimate the economy. The same bankers who promoted the Federal Reserve funded Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Molotov and Kirov (assumed names) in their godless, violent take-over of Russia. The bankers began making major profits when Bernard Baruch, Louis Brandeis and others manipulated their puppet Woodrow Wilson into entering World War I on borrowed money after the provoked attack on the Lusitania.

Winston Churchill, a Rothschild minion, referred to the Americans traveling on the ill-fated Lusitania as “live bait,” a tactic for involving the U.S. in World War I, which started the flow of money from the pockets of U.S. citizens into the vaults of Rothschild and his fellow bankers. The “live bait” tactic had been successfully used with the deaths of American sailors aboard the USS Maine. Banker-backed corporate moguls exploited the situation. Their political puppets then ordered the military to invade the resource-rich Philippines. Meanwhile, the media vilified and dehumanized the innocent Filipinos so that the invaders could rationalize killing them. Mogul minions followed up by gathering cheap labor to extract resources and the government seized land to build military bases to manage the population and protect the resources.
To legitimize propaganda for World War I, Walter Lippmann persuaded President Wilson to create the official Committee on Public Information (CPI) on April 13, 1917. Wilson appointed newspaper publisher, George Creel, as chairman. Creel commissioned the nation’s artists to produce paintings, posters and cartoons to promote the war. With the expert help of Edward Bernays, “the father of public relations” and a nephew of Sigmund Freud, the CPI manufactured the most atrocious hate propaganda against the Germans. Bernays manipulated public opinion through crowd psychology, his uncle Sigmund’s specialty. Creel had a staff of persuasive wordsmiths – journalists, writers, intellectuals and many advertisers – who later admitted they were willing to lie, use emotional appeal and enemy demonization to generate hate and fear to elicit support for the war. ³
In anticipation of entering another war, on July 11, 1941, President Roosevelt created the Office of Coordinator of Information (COI), and appointed William J. Donovan, a millionaire Wall Street lawyer, as its head. ⁴ Communist apologist Eleanor Roosevelt, Wendell Willkie, George Field, Dorothy Thompson, Herbert Bayard Swope, and prominent journalists, academics, trade unionists, theologians, and public officials founded Freedom House, a CFR front, in October 1941. FDR encouraged the group’s covert propaganda activities as he hoped it would persuade U.S. citizens to accept entry into World War II. Freedom House was also instrumental in facilitating and supporting post-war policies like the Marshall Plan, NATO, and the UN. ⁵ The Marshall Plan transferred U.S. tax dollars into the hands of the elite, camouflaged as a humanitarian effort. U.S. taxpayers rebuilt bombed-out foreign countries with the stipulation that the money be spent with banker-backed U.S. companies who raised their prices for those foreign customers.

The U.S. embargoed Japan, which depended on imports, to provoke a military response. Churchill and Roosevelt, whose governments had broken the Japanese communication codes, then monitored the progress of Japan’s military expedition to Pearl Harbor where unwary military personnel, “live bait,” 2,402 people were killed on December 7, 1941. After Japan’s retaliatory attack, the media vilified and dehumanized them. The U.S. government, urged by California farmers, also forcibly relocated and interned 110,000 Japanese Americans, mostly west coast farmers who typically sold their produce more competitively than the Caucasians. The government put the Japanese in detention camps and froze all of their assets. At least 80,000 of those individuals had been born in America.

On June 13, 1942, after the U.S. entered the war, the COI’s propaganda department joined the new Office of War Information (OWI) and was renamed the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) still under Donovan’s direction. ⁶ The OSS developed worldwide clandestine capability and employed almost 13,000 men and women. ⁷ It conducted psychological warfare, often used by governments to marshal the troops for warfare. This included constant repetition of fabricated atrocity stories to prove that the enemy was evil and had to be eliminated. ⁸

In 1942, the State Department and CFR members collaborated to set up a new “supranational organization” to replace the League of Nations, based on Wilson’s internationalist ideas. ⁹ Secretary of State Cordell Hull (CFR) asked Communist Alger Hiss to assemble a group of fourteen other CFR members to draft the United Nations Charter (UN). ¹⁰ The UN Charter displaced the U.S. Constitution with little response from the voters who were traumatized by Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor. U.S. Senators accepted the charter without even viewing a copy. They were not authorized to bind U.S. citizens, without their consent, to the conditions of the U.N. charter. ¹¹ Stalin would join the allies only if the U.S. would accept the UN. On April 12, 1952, Secretary Dulles would claim, “Treaty law can override the Constitution. Treaties can take powers away from Congress and give them to the President.” ¹²

Truman suspended OSS operations on October 1, 1945. Its leaders, trained personnel and assets were ultimately transferred into the newly created Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) via the National Security Act, July 26, 1947. Among the transferees to the CIA were four future CIA Directors, Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, William Colby, and William Casey. The CIA, created and staffed by the elite, is a worldwide organization to perpetrate covert terrorist activities. It has links to Britain’s MI6 and to the Israeli Mossad. Truman struggled to regularize the CIA’s psychological warfare, one of the agency’s greatest propaganda triumphs. ¹³

The CIA’s activities, per the official government directive, included the following, propaganda; economic warfare; preventive direct action, including industrial sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance movements, guerrilla and refugee liberation groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist or now anti-nationalist elements in countries around the world. Such operations should not include armed conflict by recognized military forces, espionage, counter-espionage, and cover and deception for military operations.” ¹⁴

Presidents Truman and Eisenhower introduced and mobilized propaganda as an official peacetime practice. Gun-toting dictators make demands but democracies use propaganda to persuade citizens to accept ideas, points of view, or policy positions as if the communication were immediately or ultimately their own. ¹⁵ Truman established the Psychological Strategy Board, as part of the CIA, on April 4, 1951 with Gordon Gray (CFR) as the first Director. Henry Kissinger, a Harvard professor, was Gray’s consultant. ¹⁶ The CIA published and disseminated hundreds of books promoting the official Cold War party line. A CIA-backed, worldwide media network provided cover for their agents and allowed the distribution of misinformation that predictably spread to the U.S. via the wire services, which also employed CIA agents who prevented problematic facts from gaining public exposure. ¹⁷

Frank Wisner, along with Allen Dulles, Richard Helms and Phillip Graham (publisher of The Washington Post and husband of CFR/Trilateralist Katharine Graham) established Operation Mockingbird, the CIA program designed to control the U.S. media. ¹⁸ For decades U.S. “news” has been fabricated. In 1981, CIA Director William Casey said, “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

In 1948, according to John F. Kennedy, many of Truman’s supporters abandoned him because he supported the Morgenthau Plan and other questionable issues. On his whistle-stop campaign train during the presidential race, an avid U.S. Zionist delivered a suitcase containing $2 million in cash which gave him the financial boost he needed to win in what was considered the greatest election upset in U.S. history. ¹⁹ Truman believed, as a result of the Holocaust, that Jews were oppressed and deserved a homeland. The British relinquished the problem of a shared Arab-Jewish state to the UN on April 2, 1947 because of Jewish terrorism in Palestine. President Truman instructed a reluctant State Department to endorse the UN’s partition plan of November 29, 1947. At midnight on May 14, 1948, Israel’s Provisional Government announced the new State of Israel. On that same day, like Roosevelt’s recognition of the Soviet government, Truman officially recognized the Zionist government in Palestine against the advice of many people. Truman didn’t bother to tell leading State Department officials who became angry when they heard about it. On May 15, 1948, the Arab states responded by invading Israel which began the first Arab-Israeli war. ²⁰ Zionists held only 7% of the land when they proclaimed their state. After Truman’s recognition, public relations experts started promoting the phrase “Judeo-Christian” to help establish America’s “special relationship” with Israel.

Dwight D. Eisenhower was president of Columbia University (1948–1953) just before he was installed as U.S. president. Bernard Baruch first met the like-minded Eisenhower in 1928. Rockefeller and Morgan agents and numerous CFR members backed Eisenhower, a womanizing scoundrel, in the presidential election in 1952. After his nomination he told the President of the United Synagogue of America, “The Jewish people could not have a better friend than me …I grew up believing that Jews was the chosen people and that they gave us the high ethical and moral principles of our civilization.” ²¹ He accommodated the OSS in their covert assassination of General George S. Patton ²² who opposed the Morgenthau Plan and Eisenhower’s death camps and was going to reveal Eisenhower’s close collaboration with the Soviets. Eisenhower halted the U.S. troops in order to allow the Soviets to “liberate” Berlin. Ilya Ehrenburg, the head of Soviet propaganda directed the Soviet troops to ravage and rape the German women. At least 50,000 and perhaps as many as 100,000 females of every age were savagely raped; many of them were tortured and killed. ²³

By 1953, the CIA had 7,200 people working on covert actions, activities that took 74% of the CIA’s yearly budget. ²⁴ The CIA always recruited their leaders from the elite class – businessmen, credible journalists, Ivy League scholars and Wall Street lawyers and bankers. Irving Kristol, Paul Weyrich, William Simon, Richard Mellon Scaife, Frank Shakespeare, and William F. Buckley, Jr. were connected to the CIA.

George Washington, in his farewell address, advised Americans to avoid an “unnatural connection with any foreign power” and “to have with them as little political connection as possible.” ²⁵ Apparently, future leaders ignored that advice. By June 1953, the U.S. government had given Israel $293,000,000 with an additional of $200,000,000 as Export-Import bank loans. The New York Herald-Tribune of March 12, 1953 reported that, in the first five years of Israel’s existence, including gifts, the total amounted to $1,000,000,000. This was in addition to the money they extracted from Germany. ²⁶

Beginning in 1953, Irving Kristol (CFR), “the godfather of neo-Conservatism,” and a former Trotskyite (opposed Stalin’s focus on Russia in preference of a worldwide system), co-edited the magazine Encounter, published in London and financed by the CIA. It was the voice of the CIA-funded Congress for Cultural Freedom and regularly promoted Fabian Socialism and the Labour Party. Kristol was also the editor of Commentary (1947-1952) and the editor of The Reporter (1959-1960). Kristol moved his family back to the U.S. by 1960. Daniel Bell (CFR) and Kristol founded The Public Interest (1965-2002), a publication of Freedom House, under the direction of George Field, its executive director. Field was also chairman of the RAND School for Social Science which was owned by the American Socialist Society and financed by the Garland Fund. Both Bell and Kristol were subsidized by the CIA, through the Congress for Cultural Freedom, the same organization that funded some of Gloria Steinem’s social engineering activities. Bell worked for Henry Luce (S&B, CFR) and advocated the dissolution of all borders and local governments.

Irving Kristol founded and published The National Interest (1985-2002). He was a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a member of the American Enterprise Institute and a John M. Olin Distinguished Fellow (1988-1999). He contributed a monthly column to the Wall Street Journal (1972-1997). He served on the Council of the National Endowment for the Humanities (1972- 1977). From the 1950s forward, chaos, in various strategic places, has reigned, perpetrated primarily by the CIA in conjunction with foreign intelligence agencies.

In 1954, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles ordered the CIA’s Saigon Military Mission (SMM) to engage in guerrilla warfare operations in Vietnam. Dulles told these “agent provocateurs” to “raise hell.” ²⁷ The turmoil was then blamed on the local citizens, who were now referred to as the insurgency. CIA Director Allen Dulles assigned Edward Lansdale and his CIA cohort Lucien Conein, to engage in unconventional warfare in Vietnam where they created the Vietnam Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG). ²⁸ In June 1954, the SMM established a campaign of undercover military and psychological warfare. They had unlimited U.S. taxpayer dollars and engaged in political, psychological and terrorist activities against the native population in the northern regions, especially in Hanoi and in the surrounding Tonkin area. They polluted petroleum supplies, sabotaged the railroad, tried to destroy the largest printing business in the North, bombed the post offices, and distributed millions of propaganda leaflets to incite fear and vast amounts of counterfeit money which created calculated inflation. ²⁹

When the Tonkinese villagers, mostly Catholic, were sufficiently frightened and intimidated, the CIA offered to transport them from the north to the south. The CIA manipulated the Catholic hierarchy who then urged thousands of Catholics to evacuate. ³⁰ Those resistant to relocation were told that the U.S. was going to use the atomic bomb on them if a civil war erupted between the north and the south. ³¹ Weapons and agents were left in the north with an abundance of CIA-supplied counterfeit currency to continue the economic destabilization. ³²
Tens of thousands of the terrorized citizens fled on foot. The CIA transported the remainder via their Civil Air Transport Airlines (CAT) and U.S. Navy ships at a cost of about $100 million. The Catholics were moved into a predominately Buddhist population which intentionally created religious, civil, and economic strife. ³³ The CIA and the Mossad are expert in population relocation in order to provoke civil and religious strife. The deliberate decimation of Mexico’s peso in the mid 1990s (and Bush’s de facto North American Union) created an influx of desperate Mexicans into the U.S, in conjunction with the drug cartel’s operations. Zionists expelled 750,000 Palestinians from their homeland in 1948; forced another 350,000 to flee Gaza in 1967 and forced another 147,000 Syrians from the Golan Heights in order to repopulate the areas, without compensation. Of course, the media suppresses these terrorist activities. Also, U.S. warfare in the Middle East caused thousands of dispossessed Muslims to flee elsewhere. This ongoing clash of cultures, the foreign incursion into America’s diminishing economy and deindustrialization (by corporate outsourcing for cheaper labor) creates tension. The media incites religious and economic outrage while concealing the cause and effect activities of the real culprits who prey on all of us.

In 1954, Israeli agents working under cover planted bombs in several Egyptian buildings, including a U.S. facility. The Israelis were trying to flip U.S. support of Egypt to Israel. So they planted evidence implicating the Arabs. However, one of the bombs detonated prematurely. The Egyptians captured one of the culprits who revealed the identities of the other members of the Israeli espionage group, some of whom were from Israel and others were local Jews. Often Israelis move to other countries, hold dual citizenship, and engage in dubious activities while working in government positions and other influential positions, in opposition to the best interests of the host country. The Israeli media immediately denied all culpability and claimed that it was a scam perpetrated by “anti-Semites,” a convenient oft-used ruse to silence justifiable criticism. However, in a subsequent trial, individuals produced clear-cut evidence that proved Israeli involvement in the bombing. Top Israelis blamed Israel’s Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon; he resigned. The operation is known as the Lavon Affair or Operation Susannah. Regarding anti-semitism, Norman G. Finkelstein wrote, “The new anti-Semitism actually incorporates three main components: (1) exaggeration and fabrication, (2) mislabeling legitimate criticism of Israeli policy, and (3) the unjustified yet predictable spillover from criticism of Israel to Jews generally.” ³⁴

On December 11, 1955, the Syrians captured five Israeli soldiers who were in the process of installing a wiretapping apparatus on the Syrian telephone network. The Israeli’s version of the event was that the five men had been abducted in Israel and taken to Syria and tortured. Public opinion was skewed in Israel and in the West in favor of Israel. By then, Israel had diverted the flow of the Jordan River at the expense of the area’s other inhabitants. On October 1, 1955, the U.S. government, through the CIA, gave Israel the “green light” to attack Egypt.  ³⁵

I was in Israel in 1999 when our group received special permission to visit a specific site on the Jordan River which was little more than a tiny stream of putrid water. It was, at that time, guarded by several gun-totting Israeli soldiers. Our tour group was repeatedly warned not to discuss Christianity with any Israeli citizen as they have disdain for Christians. According to the Talmud (Traditions of the Elders), Jesus led Israel astray; his mother Mary was an adulterer and a whore and Jesus is in hell, in boiling excrement. The Talmud states that Christians will also be in hell for eternity in “boiling excrement” if they oppose “Judaism.” Jewish sages encourage their followers to daily recite the following “Blessed be thou who hast not made me a goy.” ³⁶ Goy is a negative term for gentile; some say it means cattle.

In October 1960, just prior to the presidential election, John F. Kennedy visited with his good friend, Charles Bartlett, a journalist. The previous evening, Kennedy had been the dinner guest of an elite group of wealthy, influential Jews at the New York home of Abraham Feinberg, chairman of the American Bank and Trust Company. Their spokesman told Kennedy that they recognized that his campaign was in financial difficulty. The group then offered significant financial help if Kennedy as president “would allow them to set the course of Middle East policy over the next four years.” ³⁷

Bartlett recalled, “He said if he ever did get to be president, he would push for a law that would subsidize presidential campaigns out of the U.S. Treasury. He added that whatever the cost of this subsidy, it would insulate future presidential candidates from this kind of pressure and save the country a lot of grief in the long run.” Congressman Paul Findley (1961-1982) inquired further and discovered that Adlai E. Stevenson had a similar experience in 1956. ³⁸

Findley wrote, “Ethnic group pressure is an ever-present part of U.S. partisan politics, and because the president of the United States is the executor of all foreign policy, and the formulator of most of it, pressures naturally center on the people who hold or seek the presidency. When the pressure is from friends of Israel, presidents—and presidential candidates—often yield.” ³⁹ This has been the case since Truman’s presidency (1945–1953). Condoleezza Rice once said, “We have an Israel-centric foreign policy.” Regarding Iraq, Findley said, “Our forces invaded because Israel wanted us to topple Saddam. Two religious communities – one consisting of a combination of secular and ultra-Orthodox Jews and the other of misguided Christian fundamentalists – control U.S. Middle East policies.” ⁴⁰

By 1977, Washington Post journalist Carl Bernstein said that over 400 journalists, distinguished reporters and foreign correspondents were CIA employees. A high-level source told Bernstein, “One journalist is worth twenty agents.” Pulitzer Prize winner Arthur Schlesinger, a former OSS agent transferred to the CIA. ⁴¹ The CIA, before 1990, paid college professors to write at least 1,200 propagandistic, anti-Communist books about places like the Soviet Union, Vietnam, China, Cuba and the Congo. ⁴² Columbia University, along with other schools, is a CIA recruiting ground. The Communists recruited Whittaker Chambers when he was there.

Prior to 1967, Islamic fundamentalism was a relatively small movement. Osama bin Laden, supported by the CIA, headed the al Qaeda network. Al Qaeda, referred to as the database, was part of a CIA operation after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan on December 24, 1979, part of Columbia professor Zbigniew Brzezinski’s plan to destabilize the Soviet Union. Brzezinski (CFR), the founding Director of the Trilateral Commission and a Rockefeller minion with CIA ties as early as 1959, was President Carter’s National Security Advisor (1977-1981). By 1984, the CIA supplied textbooks for Afghan students through USAID, a CIA front group. The textbooks were written under the direction of Dr. Thomas Gouttierre, head of Afghanistan Studies at the University of Nebraska where the books were published. Dr. Gouttierre is friends with Zalmay Khalilzad (CFR), U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan and Iraq (2003). Khalilzad, an Afghan-born Muslim was a former adviser to Unocal and was an Assistant Political Science Professor at Columbia University (1979-1986) where he worked closely with Brzezinski.

The textbooks were designed to create a militaristic populace in order to provoke resistance to the Soviets and future enemies. The book’s illustrations included tanks, land mines and missiles and promoted hatred. ⁴³ The U.S. supplied these incendiary textbooks (1984-1994) under Presidents Reagan and George H. W. Bush (S&B). Bush was Vice President under Reagan (1981-1989). All CIA records regarding Bush and his company, Zapata covering 1960 to 1966 were destroyed when he became vice president in 1981. Bush was CIA director (1976-1977).

In 1982, President Reagan created the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in order to acceptably manage CIA activities. Freedom House, the group created in 1941, became a part of this network. NED helped to finance Freedom House. Paul Wolfowitz, in the early 1980s, along with his neoconservative allies, collaborated with numerous Trotskyites. With the hidden funding and under the cover of conservative think tanks, the U.S. government can influence the public and conceal its interventions in foreign politics.

At least six million people had perished by 1987 as a result of the CIA’s covert operations. Not only is the CIA not an intelligence agency, it distorts information and perpetuates misinformation and disinformation to justify its own goals. This wide-range deception has resulted in organized terrorism throughout the world. Using the CIA, our government routinely dismisses or ignores national and international laws under the guise of “national security.” ⁴⁴

Interestingly, alarm over Islamic fundamentalism actually occurred at about the same time that Reagan called for the dismantlement of the Berlin Wall, formally concluded on October 3, 1990, followed by the official collapse of the Soviet Union on December 25, 1991. With Soviet Communism gone and the Berlin Wall dismantled, the State Department would either be forced to create another enemy or decrease their defense budget to about half of what it had been which would really cut into the elite’s profits. Shortly thereafter, the first Gulf War was devised to purportedly protect the oil resources of the Middle East against so-called “rogue states and nuclear outlaws.” ⁴⁵ Islamic fundamentalism, our latest enemy, replaced Communism.

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf (CFR), the man behind the proposed Muslim community center two blocks from ground zero, came to the U.S. with his family in 1965. In 1997 he founded the American Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMS), a tax-exempt foundation. Its mission statement states, “We collaborate with other faith-based organizations to build relationships of trust through dialogue and education, honoring the diversity of faiths, sharing commonalities, and celebrating differences.” ⁴⁶ Interestingly, ASMS is funded by the Rockefeller Brothers; the Carnegie Corporation of New York; Rockefeller Philanthropy; Rockefeller Brothers Fund; Global Fund for Women; The Russell Family Foundation; Danny Kaye & Sylvia Fine Foundation; Graham Charitable Foundation; Henry Luce Foundation; Hunt Alternatives; The Ms. Foundation and other elite tax-exempt foundations. ⁴⁷ The people who sign the check determine the policy. Are all of these people on the same team, playing the public and causing controlled conflict?

In 1972, Gloria Steinem (CIA agent extraordinaire), Patricia Carbine, Letty Cottin Pogrebin and Marlo Thomas founded The Ms. Foundation. ⁴⁸ Steinem’s social engineering activities led to Roe v. Wade. Pogrebin authored In Defense of the Law of Return for The Nation on December 22, 2003, a law passed in Israel on July 5, 1950 which grants any Jew automatic citizenship. ⁴⁹ Pogrebin, a financial contributor to Obama since 2004, ⁵⁰ is a member of Americans for Peace Now (APN) the most prominent American Jewish Zionist organization working to achieve a comprehensive political settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict. ⁵¹

Former Harvard professor, William “Bill” Kristol, the son of Irving Kristol, was Chief of Staff to Vice President Dan Quayle, under the first Bush regime. Bill Kristol founded the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), a tax-exempt foundation, in the spring of 1997, the same year that Rauf founded the ASMS. PNAC, with close ties to the American Enterprise Institute, was funded by the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation and the Bradley Foundation. Its objectives are U.S. Global supremacy and a “Greater Israel.” Twenty-five people signed their mission statement, seventeen of whom belong to the CFR, whose objective is a one-world government. Founding members include Elliott Abrams (CFR), Gary Bauer, William J. Bennett (Irving Kristol’s protégé), Jeb Bush, Richard B. Cheney (CFR), Eliot A. Cohen (CFR), Midge Decter (CFR), Paula Dobriansky (CFR), Steve Forbes, Aaron Friedberg (CFR), Francis Fukuyama (CFR), Frank Gaffney, Fred C. Ikle (CFR), Donald Kagan (CFR), Zalmay Khalilzad (CFR), I. Lewis Libby (CFR), Norman B. Podhoretz (CFR), Dan Quayle, Peter W. Rodman (CFR), Stephen P. Rosen (CFR), Henry S. Rowen (CFR), Donald Rumsfeld, Vin Weber (CFR), George Weigel (CFR), and Paul Wolfowitz (CFR). In 1992 Libby and Wolfowitz wrote Defense Planning Guidance for Defense Secretary Dick Cheney.

Bill Kristol, advocates neoconservatism, the American version of Trotsky’s Bolshevism. Kristol, a Bilderberger, a Manhattan Institute trustee, is also the editor and co-founder, along with John Podhoretz, of the Weekly Standard Magazine, established September 17, 1995 and funded, at a loss, by Rupert Murdoch (CFR), a Zionist. This so-called conservative magazine, co-edited by Fred Barnes, promotes the warhawk mentality, the same message heard on numerous “conservative” talk shows and on Murdoch’s Fox Network. Weekly Standard contributors include Joseph Epstein, Charles Krauthammer (CFR), Brit Hume, a Fulbright scholar, ⁵² Tucker Carlson, Robert W. Kagan (CFR) foreign policy analyst and son of Donald Kagan (CFR), Yale Professor John Podhoretz (son of Norman Podhoretz) and others. In 1995 Kristol confessed to the New Yorker: “The liberal media were never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for conservative failures.” ⁵³ See a video on PNAC (warning: language).

Norman B. Podhoretz (CFR), a Trotskyite, in his books has admitted that the reason for the Cold War was to weaponize Israel to fight the Arab nations. He belongs to the influential New York chapter of the American Jewish Committee, one of the leading Zionist organizations operating within the U.S. It publishes the “liberal-turned-conservative” Commentary magazine. ⁵⁴ Kagan is a columnist for the Washington Post which was associated with the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird. He is a senior associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and wrote Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order.

Now, remembering that the CIA probably controls much of what we hear from the elite-owned media, according to Pew, 30% of all Americans obtain their news from talk radio and cable television – many never read a book. A large percentage get their “news” from the Fox Network whose employees receive the morning memo, a directive on how to spin the “news” of the day. Roger Ailes, former Republican campaign wizard, is president of Fox News Channel and chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group which has a throng of “journalists” and guests who push right-wing propaganda disguised as news. ⁵⁵ According to a decision by the Florida Appeals Court on February 14, 2003 in the Jane Akre whistleblower lawsuit, the court agreed with Fox News that it is not against the law to distort or falsify the news in the U.S. ⁵⁶

In 1997, Israël Shahak wrote, “Since the spring of 1992, public opinion in Israel is being prepared for the prospect of a war with Iran, to be fought to bring about Iran’s total military and political defeat. In one version, Israel would attack Iran alone; in another it would ‘persuade’ the West to do the job.” ⁵⁷ On January 26, 1998, the PNAC warhawks, in a letter to President Clinton, urged him to invade Iraq to depose Saddam Hussein.

In October 1998, the Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group completed a nine-month long study of the “technologies and defenses” against terrorists. The study group was a collaboration of the faculty of Harvard, MIT, Stanford and the University of Virginia. It was funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the Herbert S. Winokur Public Policy Fund at Harvard University. The group produced a report entitled: Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy. ⁵⁸ An article based on the academic Study Group report appeared in the CFR journal Foreign Affairs in the November-December 1998 issue, the same year that PNAC wrote to President Clinton suggesting the removal of Hussein.
The project director was Philip D. Zelikow, later the gatekeeper executive director of the 9/11 Commission. He earlier co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice (both members of Bush 41’s National Security Council) entitled Germany Unified and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft. Zelikow also authored The National Security Strategy of the United States which became the new preemptive war doctrine of the Bush administration written for then National Security Council Director, Condoleezza Rice who had worked on the Bush transition team. He had a hidden agenda – connect al Qaeda and Iraq. ⁵⁹

PNAC’s policy statements were compiled in Rebuilding America’s Defenses, Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, published in September 2000.

We read, “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” ⁶⁰ It appears that 9/11 was that new Pearl Harbor. As Shahak indicated, Israel was going to persuade the West to wage war. Just how would Israeli political leaders “persuade” the U.S. to invade their enemy, a country that has not militarily assaulted the U.S.? The elite, for over 100 years, has used false flag assaults and very pervasive media propaganda to win public support for their warfare. The CIA and their foreign intelligence counterpart, the Mossad, have lengthy experience in false flag tactics, the actual reason for their existence. At least two previous incidents, probably more, involved Israel.
On June 8, 1967, there was a failed attempt to use the “live bait”  device, with government foreknowledge, with the USS Liberty. The Zionist owned U.S. media kept quiet about the Israeli attack on the ship. Then on October 12, 2000, the “live bait” tactic was used in the USS Cole where seventeen U.S. sailors were killed, and thirty-nine were injured. A small boat moved to the port side of the destroyer when all the sailors were gathering in the galley for lunch. An explosion occurred which created a 40-by-40-foot hole in the ship. Al Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden, a CIA asset, took credit for the attack. Yet, samples of the explosives retrieved from the ship’s hull showed that materials used were only available in the U.S. and Israel. Then the “live bait” tactic was used on 9/11 to get the U.S. to remove Hussein and bomb Iraq back to the Stone Age.

Within twenty-four hours of 9/11 the media miraculously, as if all the information were prepared beforehand, revealed histories, photos, and details about the Muslim terrorists who allegedly perpetrated the attack. Bin Laden, who died in December 2001, even came back from the dead to claim responsibility. ⁶¹ Fox News announced his death on December 26, 2001. ⁶² Despite the terrorist’s amazing ability to subvert the military response apparatus of the world’s most powerful nation, they failed to cover their trail and left a substantial amount of easy-to-find fireproof evidence. Their unhindered assault on a specific section of the Defense Department halted an audit that would have exposed billions of dollars of stolen money that had been funneled to special friends. The Port Authority, after it lost a 10-year asbestos lawsuit on May 1, 2001, were stuck with a money-losing albatross that they couldn’t get a license to demolish. On July 24, 2001 Eisenberg of the Port Authority leased the towers to his friend Larry Silverstein. Almost prophetically, Silverstein quickly insured the towers against a terrorist attack. ⁶³

On September 20, 2001, PNAC members sent a letter to President Bush in which they urged him to wage the nation’s “first war of the 21^st century” including the capture or killing of Osama bin Laden, and the capture and prosecution of any and all perpetrators of 9/11. They encouraged Bush to go after any other group that means us harm. They advocated the end of Hussein’s government and the financial and military support of any Iraqi opposition. They also encouraged him to go after Hezbollah and the countries that support them, Iran and Syria. If Iran and Syria fail to comply and cooperate then the U.S. should take action against those countries. They further recommended that the U.S. withhold support from the Palestinians in favor of support to Israel. ⁶⁴

The letter said, “…But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.” ⁶⁵ Richard Perle said, “This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq, then we take a look around and see how things stand. This is entirely the wrong way to go about it… If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely, and we don’t try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war … our children will sing great songs about us years from now.” ⁶⁶ Paul Wolfowitz said the anti-terrorism campaign has to be broad and sustained. “It’s not going to stop if a few criminals are taken care of.” ⁶⁷ Iran, another industrial competitor, is the next war target which brings us back to the subject of Feisal Abdul Rauf, the individual behind the Manhattan mosque project.

Rauf is a member of the World Economic Forum’s Council of 100, an organization composed of business, political, religious, media and opinion leaders that advocates openness and understanding between the West and Muslim world. ⁶⁸ Rauf is also a member of the CFR’s Religious Advisory Committee, along with Jim Wallis, publisher of Sojourners. He has been an imam in New York City for twenty-seven years. The building project, the Cordoba House, a 13-story, $100 million project, is planned as a community center complete with a swimming pool, culinary school, art studios and other features. It is to be built on properly zoned, private property two blocks from ground zero. The city Landmarks Preservation Commission approved of the construction. However, the American Center for Law and Justice, founded by Reverend Pat Robertson, filed a lawsuit in a state court to dispute the commission’s decision. They could have built the facility, like any other private group, on private property, without public scrutiny. The media has driven this issue and incited anger.

Recall that Freedom House was organized in 1941 to promote World War II. They are still propagandizing. William Howard Taft IV (S&B, PNAC⁶⁹) is its current chairman. It is an international non-governmental organization that endorses a one-world government and opposes all nationalist governments. It has offices in offices in Algeria, Hungary, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mexico, Uzbekistan, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Ukraine. Taft supports the Law of the Sea which places all of the oceans under the jurisdiction of the UN. Since 1941, the group has developed ties to the CIA, the Brookings Institution, the U.S. Institute of Peace and other institutions and government agencies. Freedom House, a propaganda vehicle, is also a front group for the CFR, the British counterpart of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. In 2005 Freedom House was receiving U.S. government funds “for clandestine activities inside Iran.”

The organization receives about 66% of its budget from the U.S. government. ⁷⁰ See the list of their board members here. Other financing comes from the Scaife Family Foundation which finances many groups and individuals, especially those associated with the CFR, including, Newt Gingrich’s (CFR) GOPAC, the Federalist Society, the Media Research Center and Joseph Farah’s World Net Daily – all of which selectively dispense “conservative views.” The National Endowment for Democracy, a proponent for one world governance also finances Freedom House. ⁷¹

R. James Woolsey (CFR, PNAC) former CIA Director (1993-1995) was a signatory on the 1998 letter to President Clinton calling for Hussein’s removal. On September 11, 2001, Woolsey claimed that Iraq was involved in the attack. A year later, he claimed that Iraq was also involved in the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center and the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Woolsey, a former Chairman of Freedom House board (2003- 2005) was a Rhodes Scholar and a Booz Allen Vice President (2002-2008). ⁷² He was part of the secretive North American Forum held in Canada, September 12-14, 2006. ⁷³ In July 2006, Woolsey suggested that the U.S. bomb Syria. His wife, Suzanne H. Woolsey (CFR), has been a Director of the Fluor Corp., an engineering and contracting firm since February 3, 2004. By August 2004, Fluor had a $1.6 billion Iraqi reconstruction contract. Fluor made about $1.3 billion for reconstruction after Hurricane Katrina (August 23-29, 2005), ⁷⁴ a storm (HAARP?) that displaced 1.5 million people and caused about $81.2 billion in damage. On September 26, 2005, Senator Mel Martinez hosted the Halliburton-sponsored “Katrina Reconstruction Summit” for no-Katrina-victims-need-apply contractors. ⁷⁵
Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom is now listed on the Hudson Institute web site. On November 15, 2005, Nina Shea (CFR), the Director of the Center for Religious Freedom at Freedom House presented a 19-page report to the Committee on International Relations of the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights and International Operations. This report describes the followers of Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabi ideology and elaborates on the millions of Muslims who have relocated to the United States. Shea said, “Earlier this year, Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom released a report based on a year-long study of the radically intolerant Wahhabi ideology contained in documents spread, published, or otherwise generated by the government of Saudi Arabia and found in the United States. Extremist Wahhabism is Saudi Arabia’s state religion; it is also the Saudi government’s aim to propagate it and have it replace traditional and moderate interpretations of Islam worldwide, including within the United States.” ⁷⁶

Another report, Saudi Arabia’s Curriculum of Intolerance, issued on May 23, 2006, by Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom analyzed the textbooks used by the Saudi Ministry of Education by their elementary and secondary students. These textbooks, according to Freedom House, advocate hatred of anyone, including Muslims, who reject the Wahhabi dogma. The 2006 report was created by Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom which collaborated with the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs. Their study covered the textbooks used in Saudi Arabia and Saudi schools outside that country. The Institute for Gulf Affairs collected the books to be used in the study from families, teachers, and administrators associated with Saudi schools. Freedom House then had them translated. ⁷⁷ Did USAID have anything to do with these textbooks?

Nina Shea said, “What is being taught today in Saudi public school textbooks about how Muslims should relate to other religious communities will poison the minds of a new generation of Saudis. Whatever changes have been made in the Saudi educational system, clearly more needs to be done.” The Saudi government had revised all of their educational materials to eliminate all intolerant materials. But, according to the Freedom House report, the textbooks “condemn and denigrate the majority of Sunni Muslims” who reject the Wahhabi brand of Islam. The report also claims that the textbooks encourage Muslims to “hate” Christians, Jews and other “unbelievers.” The Saudi public school system has 25,000 schools, with about five million students. They also have academies in nineteen world capitals. One of these is located just outside of Washington in Alexandria, Virginia. They all use the same religious textbooks. Saudi Arabia also distributes its textbooks around the world to many Islamic schools. ⁷⁸

Barack Obama, as I have previously written, was a CIA asset and attended Columbia University where Marxist apologist, Zbigniew Brzezinski, taught. Obama was born (1961), named, mentored, media puffed and financed into the White House by Soros, Rockefeller and other bankers. According to Wayne Madsen, Obama’s mother, grandparents and other associates were also CIA.

Former community organizer, Barack Hussein Obama, be he Muslim, Christian or a minion for Israel, is furthering the destruction of the U.S. economy per his agreement with the bankers when they financed his presidency. Citizens will blame the Muslim in the White House and take vengeance on U.S. Muslims as the destabilization continues. Obama, in 2008, his efforts to serving AIPAC’s agenda. He has links to Wright’s Christian (liberation theology) church in Chicago and has publicly implied that he is . Is he just a CIA chameleon who alters his rhetoric for his current audience? Or is this a distracting Psy Ops designed to distract and divide U.S. citizens while the elite snicker. He is still a community organizer but on a much larger scale.

Part of the operation has Republican Orly Taitz (b. 1960), the Jewish lawyer, dentist, and perhaps Mossad, along with Philip J. Berg, a Jewish Democrat are publicizing Obama’s , a detail that was openly announced in 2004 when he was running for an Illinois senate seat. ⁷⁹ Taitz emigrated from the Soviet Union to Israel in 1981 where she attended Hebrew University. In 1987 she met and quickly married a software engineer visiting from California named Yosef Taitz and soon she was in the U.S. She believes that Israel should “exterminate” the Arabs. She is associated with AIPAC and believes that Obama’s policies are “a clear and present danger to Israel.” ⁸⁰ Ironically, in regard to the birth issue, Taitz said, “When you allow somebody with allegiance to other nations to become president, that’s extremely dangerous.” ⁸¹ Good Heavens, save us from the arrogant, blatant elites and their useful idiots.
That’s true for any political office. Three hundred members (69%) of the House of Representatives signed a letter addressed to Secretary of State Clinton affirming “the unbreakable bond” that exists between the U.S. and the State of Israel. Given that fact, I hardly think that the imposition of Sharia law is a viable threat. ⁸² As long as the “National Menorah” is prominently displayed at the White House⁸³ during the holidays instead of a Christian scene, I think U.S. citizens can be assured that Sharia law is not a threat.

Scientists understand that monotonous patterns produce a stupor that renders people vulnerable to hypnosis. Certain low-level frequencies or unperceived waves exist in radio and television, the normal vehicle for mass hypnosis. It is the prime method of controlling huge populations. ⁸⁴ On 9/11, everything shut down, except our television sets; we were extra attentive and traumatized, the most effective of any indoctrination process. Many still believe that Muslims perpetrated 9/11.

Politicians, journalists, and media personalities are repeatedly expressing outrage over the possible construction of the Muslim community center two blocks from ground zero. This attention serves to ignite the emotions that we all felt that day, conveniently near the anniversary. It serves to re-establish the connection between 9/11 and the Muslims. It is a psychological operation of the most organized kind. The government has had almost a decade to reiterate their deceptive version of the event. Many naïve people, not wanting to complicate their lives with the horrible reality, believe the government/media’s first reports – it is easier than acknowledging that they’ve been so easily deceived.

Former Speaker of the House, internationalist Newt Gingrich (CFR, NAFTA proponent), a recipient of millions from Sheldon Adelson, argues, “One of our biggest mistakes in the aftermath of 9/11 was naming our response to the attacks ‘the war on terror’ instead of accurately identifying radical Islamists (and the underlying ideology of radical Islamism) as the target of our campaign… Radical Islamism is more than simply a religious belief. It is a comprehensive political, economic, and religious movement that seeks to impose Sharia—Islamic law—upon all aspects of global society.” ⁸⁵
Madeleine Albright (CFR), while Secretary of State, said, “If we have to use force, it is because we are America. We are the indispensable nation.” ⁸⁶ Over 170 million people were slaughtered by governments during the 20^th century. Ten million died in World War I and fifty million died in World War II. Of those who were killed during World War II, almost 70% were civilians. This so-called collateral damage was a consequence of indiscriminant bombing by Britain and America. ⁸⁷ Then there was Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a potential war in Iran and the unpublicized CIA wars. Yet, many citizens, rather than focusing on America’s brutality, claim that Islam is violent.

The Muslims are not the enemy. They don’t extort usury through the Federal Reserve; they aren’t manufacturing population-reducing vaccines and GMO seeds; they didn’t devise our abortion laws (about fifty million dead); they didn’t bail out the banks; they didn’t create the Department of Homeland Security and impose the PATRIOT Act; they aren’t wiretapping our private conversations or scanning us at the airport; they didn’t impose godless Communism on several countries and cause the death of millions of innocent people; they haven’t instituted the draconian healthcare laws; they have not orchestrated the nation’s economic crashes; they have not deindustrialized the nation and outsourced so many jobs; they haven’t wiped out the middle class by passing trade laws like NAFTA; ⁸⁸ and they haven’t foreclosed on thousands of homes; they are not the reason thousands of people live in tent cities; they haven’t developed depleted uranium weapons. Instead of worrying about a mosque, consider what’s going on behind the closed doors at the Federal Reserve, the Pentagon, the Senate and House chambers, the CFR, the State Department, the UN or dozens of other places. The Muslims didn’t instigate the attacks on the USS Liberty or the USS Cole and they didn’t orchestrate the highly organized attack in Manhattan on 9/11.

People should be burning the 9/11 Commission Report or if they insist on burning a religious book, burn the Bible or the Talmud instead of the Quran. Most of the people who insist that the Quran is full of hate have never even seen the book.

Footnotes:

1, West-Islamic World Dialogue.
2, Partial list of people associated with the Project for the New American Century, People identified as being connected to the PNAC because either they are listed on the organization’s web site, or their names appear as authors/contributors on official PNAC documents. Information current to Dec. 2004.
3, Freedom House Financial Statement, 2007.
4, Ibid
5, R. James Woolsey – Booz Allen VP.
6, Secret Rumsfeld Meeting To Implement North American Union.
7, Rebuilding: At What Cost and in who’s Image by Rita J. King, Special to CorpWatch, August 16th, 2006.
8, Curbing Government Contractor Abuse, San Diego Union-Tribune By Charlie Cray, September 30, 2005.
9, Testimony Of Nina Shea, Director Center for Religious Freedom, Freedom House Before The Committee on International Relations U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights and
International Operations “In Defense of Human Dignity: The 2005 International Religious Freedom Report”
November 15, 2005, p. 16.
10, Freedom House Press Release, Revised Saudi Government Textbooks Still Demonize Christians, Jews, Non-Wahhabi Muslims and Other, Washington, DC, May 23, 2006.
11, Ibid
12, Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate.
13, Orly Taitz: Obama policies are ‘clear and present danger to Israel’, The driving force behind the ‘birther’ movement has found her star is rising in Israel by Benjamin L. Hartman, Ha’aretz.
14, In Doubt’s Shadow, Soviet Jewish Émigré Orly Taitz is the ‘Queen Bee’ of the ‘Birther’ Movement.
15, Nearly 300 Congress members declare commitment to ‘unbreakable’ U.S.-Israel bond, Letter to Clinton underscores Biden remarks that there is ‘no space’ when it comes to Israel’s security by Natasha Mozgovaya.
16, Rahm Emanuel Lights National Menorah At White House, AP/ The Huffington Post, 12-13-09.
17, Operation Mind Control by Walter Bowart, Dell Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1978.
18, Newt Direct, No Mosque at Ground Zero, July 28, 2010.
19, Derailing Democracy, the America the Media Don’t Want You to See by David McGowan, Common Courage Press, Monroe, Maine, 2000, p. 167.
20, A Century of War: Lincoln, Wilson, and Roosevelt by John V. Denson, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama, 2006, p. 17.
21, Bill Clinton and his NAFTA Baby Co-Conspirators.

 

Cannon Fodder for the New World Order

In 1926, General Cherep-Spiridovich wrote, “War is only a ‘legalized mass murder.’ Thus Christ pointed out those who arrange all wars and revolutions, and that their chief cause is Satan and his sons’ ‘lust of murder.’ But ‘Christians’ never seem to agree with Christ.” [1] Gandhi concurred when he said, “Everyone but Christians understands that Jesus was nonviolent.” Those who “arrange all wars,” are typically among the very top echelon of secret societies, often Illuminati front groups like Skull and Bones, many of whom serve in elected and unelected government positions. Government officials implement a dark agenda of terrorism and genocide through directives developed by members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) the Bilderberg (BB), and the Trilateral Commission (TC). Some may view these allegations as incredible conspiracy theories, which is exactly the perspective that the media-managing elites encourage in order to conceal their reprehensible operations and their true loyalties.

General Cherep-Spiridovich said that those who arrange wars have a “lust of murder.” They also demonstrate a lust for power and profit, made possible by government-sanctioned warfare, funded by privately owned central banks which print billions of debt-based, interest-laden dollars, debt that is passed off onto the citizens who also fight and die in those wars. The increased glut of cash into the market devalues the currency already in circulation and further jeopardizes the country’s diminishing economy. The malevolent, parasitical bankers achieve their objectives by funding power-hungry, often psychopathic, well-compensated politicians who accommodate the bankers at the expense of the citizens they claim to represent. Representative government ends when the polls close. Christians have been persuaded to accept what Christ long ago disdained and warned against – usury. Citizens are manipulated into participating in war. Essentially, in accepting pro-war propaganda, we abandon Christianity and acquiesce to the mass slaughter of strangers targeted by the warmongers. In effect, we idolatrously “worship the golden calf” of the banker-backed, man-made state when we abandon the peaceful tenets of Christianity. If double-minded individuals, either naively or knowingly, promote war while claiming to abhor abortion, we absolutely must evaluate their motives and loyalties and then withhold our support for warfare. In Christianity, there should be no fence sitting, no serving of two masters.

The Ten Commandments include “You shall have no other gods before me” and “You shall not murder (kill). Communists and Socialists, who like Lucifer, are rebellious towards God, attempt to replace Him and impose their own laws upon the naïve masses. An authoritative state advocates, with numerous deceitful justifications, mass murder through warfare, actually genocide of entire foreign populations. Like Lucifer, since Lincoln’s War, the war planners always shift the blame for the initiation of warfare onto others via the use of false flag operations. The highly skilled war planners choreograph or aggressively provoke an attack and then call for a retaliatory strike against the people they attribute the attack to. From the shots fired at Fort Sumter, the explosion on the USS Maine, the sinking of the Lusitania, the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Tonkin incident, and numerous attacks on various U.S. embassies, there have been managed assaults. One of the major functions of the CIA is to create chaos in other countries – just so the U.S. can justify sending in military troops to restore order. That is how the deceitful war planners get our support; we believe that we are valiantly defending our country.

Christians should be the first to recognize the probability of secret societies or secret combinations and money interests that are so intent on depriving others of their liberty, life and property. Christ’s death, though redemptive, was the result of a currency conspiracy. There were also plots to kill Paul and other disciples. Early day “public relations” provocateurs skillfully influenced the pliable masses in order to execute their covert agenda – remember, the loving admirers who bowed before Christ upon His entry into Jerusalem, were the exact same people who, a few days later, clamored for His death. What changed? The moneychangers, the same greedy people who sold the over-priced sacrificial animals in the temple courtyard, would have lost their future profits if people accepted His rational teachings on usury and the charitable cessation of the exploitation of others. After all, we work for our sakes, not to have others confiscate the product of our labors.

Government education spawns battalions of potential soldiers who are willing to die “for their country.” Eager soldiers have been advantageously and subtly prepared through compelling peer pressure participation in Pentagon-designed video games that have been commercially marketed as entertainment. Dutiful teachers working within the federally controlled educational system regularly memorialize the vilest, most warmongering politicians of the past. This subtle programming is supported by a controlled media which has been licensed and regulated by the federal government (FCC) since the 1920s. The international bankers, who profit most from warfare, have controlled the entertainment and documentary media for decades. Media moguls, often in conjunction with the Pentagon, produce movies that glorify war, promote immorality, immodesty and profanity, all in an effort to subtly shape our opinions, alter our culture and persuade us to abandon traditional Christian values. If Christians forfeit so-called small ideals, they are more likely to relinquish Christ’s prohibition against warfare.

Prior to the U.S. entering World War II, the influential media vilified anti-war activists by characterizing them as unpatriotic, Nazi and anti-Semitic. They were portrayed as un-American traitors. [2] These psychologically devised tactics were created by Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud and are still employed today to discourage dissent and immobilize inquiry. Anti-war activists and dissidents are allowed airtime with super-skilled radio and television hosts whose sole purpose is to repudiate the ideas of their guests, ridicule the truth, and castigate candidates who question U.S. foreign policy. These tactics are designed to produce a herd mentality within the population. Individuals reconsider their rhetoric when they see others discredited for similar views and remain silent. These devices, which discredit individuals and information, also discourage others from examining certain events and circumstances for themselves.

International bankers, without particular national loyalties or regard for those used as cannon fodder, typically fund both sides of every war and often have major investments in, or outright ownership of, ammunition production facilities. Guaranteed contracts for tons of one-time-use bullets and bombs are tremendously more lucrative than selling cars and washing machines to consumers. Henry Kissinger, one-time U.S. Secretary of State said, “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy.” [3]

Given the manner in which individual governments exploit soldiers to enrich the bankers, those troops are evidently expendable. Their bloodied bodies create massive profits for the international bankers, the original advocates of globalism, acquired through warfare, usually followed by sanctions, reparations and finally obedience to an international entity. A nation uses warfare to impose its policies on another nation. Gutele Schnapper Rothschild, the wife of Mayer A. Rothschild, who grew enormously wealthy by collecting usury while funding the European wars, said, “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” One might add “grandsons, great grandsons and other male relatives and all of their banking affiliates camouflaged under numerous names – Goldman Sachs, Lehman, Kuhn-Loeb, Citibank and others.”

While Mother Rothschild sounded decidedly cold-hearted, other Talmudic Judaics, like the contemporary Rabbi Haim Druckman, a leader of the Religious Zionist movement, said on September 7, 2004, “Killing enemy civilians during war is normal.” Druckman and other like-minded Zionists view gentiles and even their own Semitic kinsmen, the Palestinians, including children, as sub-humans. The Talmud states, “Our lives come first.” Druckman ridiculed Christian opposition to warfare, “The Christian preaching of ‘turning the other cheek’ doesn’t concern us, and we will not be impressed by those who prefer the lives of our enemies to our lives.” [4] And who is the enemy – any country that resists the international banker’s insistence on installing a central bank within their country. Further, banker-backed corporations target, confiscate and profit from the seizure and control of the natural resources in the said enemy’s land. Many Christians, indoctrinated to believe that there is such a thing as a “good war,” have unwittingly accepted barbaric total war tactics regarding unarmed women and children, and are perfectly willing to engage in mass slaughter at the behest of the bankers.

Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov), a Bolshevik said, “The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.” [5] The way to get the U.S. to incrementally embrace communism began in 1913 with the establishment of the privately owned Federal Reserve. The massively wealthy owners of the Federal Reserve would ultimately invest in and sit on the boards of every major corporation and eventually capture the majority of America’s wealth in addition to usury, burdensome taxation and continual warfare.

International Communism, adapted for expediency, was a means of brutal seizure of control, a perfect political mechanism for the international bankers. If people objected to tyranny, they were sent to slave labor camps or were quickly killed and silenced. Lenin and Trotsky (Lev Davidovich Bronstein) were divided on one issue – Lenin supported violent revolution while Trotsky favored a non-violent, intellectual approach to total government control. [6] Lenin maintained, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” In America, the bankers control the left and the right paradigm, the conservatives and the liberals, the Democrats and the Republicans. American Trotskyites, who prefer intellectual infiltration, seized the “conservative” label and continue to promote their agenda through numerous “conservative” groups. They manipulate and publicly promote certain religious leaders who then endorse that same agenda. The Trotskyites fund influential, noble named think tanks and regularly appear in the media.

Americans are aghast when they hear about the millions of Chinese and Russian citizens who have been slaughtered by their Communist masters. Yet, under the federally sanctioned abortion laws, approximately fifty million people have been eliminated under the intellectual guise of “freedom of choice.” The ultimate abortion decision was fueled by the CIA-funded women’s movement. Steinem and the others were well paid to pretend concern for the rights of women while ignoring the rights of infants. So rather than Lenin’s depopulation method, the U.S. used Trotsky’s more subtle process. The results are the same.

Contemporary Neo-cons William “Bill” Kristol and Robert Kagan established the Project for a New American Century, which called for a “new Pearl Harbor” in order to implement momentous change and to conduct Middle East warfare. Kristol’s late father, Irving Kristol who was often funded by the CIA, is known as the “godfather of neo-conservatism.” His organization promotes warfare (revolution), first in Iraq and now in Iran. Charles Krauthammer and Kristol, editor of the Rupert Murdoch-funded The Weekly Standard, the official voice of this cabal,[7] and their Neo-con cronies provide opposition to the left agenda, as suggested by Lenin. On September 18, 2002, Kristol claimed that a war in Iraq “could have terrifically good effects throughout the Middle East.” [8] Krauthammer and Kristol regularly appear on pro-Israel Murdoch’s “fair and balanced” Fox News where they allege that Iran is building nuclear weapons, a subtle form of their previous allegations about Iraqi’s weapons of mass destruction. Murdoch has always been a Rothschild family asset.

On February 17, 2003, Krauthammer, a prominent Washington Post columnist writing in Time admitted that America’s imminent war against Iraq “is not just to disarm Saddam. It is to reform a whole part of the world…What the U.S. needs in the Arab world is not an exit strategy but an entry strategy. Iraq is the beckoning door…” Krauthammer further targeted “Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria and beyond” as part of the neo-conservative war policy. On February 18, 2003, as reported in the Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon suggested that the U.S. wage war on Iran, Libya and Syria after “the successful destruction of Iraq.” [9] Krauthammer, a former psychiatrist has called for an all-out U.S. war against the Muslim world. [10] War is the most effective way of bankrupting a nation and to set it up for total collapse and a tyrannical takeover. The warfare in the Middle East is not in the best interests of America – it only serves the international bankers.

On March 17, 2003, just before the U.S. invaded Iraq, Kristol, in his editorial in The Weekly Standard, wrote, “obviously, we are gratified that the Iraq strategy we have long advocated . . . has become the policy of the U.S. government.” On March 18, The Washington Post clarified his obvious influence when their columnist, Richard Cohen, referred to the impending conflict as “Kristol’s War” and prior to the “shock and awe” bombing of Baghdad, “this would seem to be Kristol’s moment.” [11]

Millionaires and billionaires buy up politicians. Those who defy the bankers suffer dire consequences, like Charles A. Lindbergh, whose grandson was kidnapped and murdered. Lindbergh had written articles of impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors against five members of the Federal Reserve Board, W. P. G. Harding, Paul M. Warburg, Frederick Delano, Adolf C. Miller and Charles S. Hamlin. Louis T. McFadden, another defiant Congressman died as a result of poisoning, their third attempt to eliminate him. Other non-compliant politicians are run out of office, assassinated, arrested, die in airplane crashes, are impeached or publicly humiliated. U.S. politicians understandably fear the international bankers more than they fear the wrath of their disgruntled constituents.

Author R. Duane Willing, in his book Money, the 12^th & Final Religion, claims that Richard M. Nixon, once compliant, fell from grace when he attempted to alter the nation’s money system and develop an interest-free Greenback-style currency which would have immobilized the national debt and obliterated the curse of usury. In 1969, Nixon appointed Dr. Preston Martin as Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. Martin allegedly masterminded Nixon’s currency plan which would have converted 4,950 Savings and Loans into full commercial banks with the capacity of issuing checking accounts. This would have created a nationwide banking network outside of the auspices of the Federal Reserve network. [12]

Austrian-born Arthur F. Burns (Burnseig), chairman of the Federal Reserve (1970-1978), had offices on the 8^th floor of the Watergate Apartment Hotel. On June 17, 1972, five husky Watergate burglars were apprehended on the 6^th floor after they had carried heavy files from Burns’ office down to the 6^th floor for photographing. [13] Allegedly, the burglars had broken into the Democratic National Committee headquarters, a convenient cover story. However, Martin was apparently promised the future chairmanship of the Federal Reserve if he abandoned Nixon and the populist currency plan that would have ended the power of the Federal Reserve. Nixon was purged from the presidency by a media-driven frenzy and forced to resign on August 9, 1974. [14] He was later pardoned by Ford, probably on the basis of his continued silence about the real details surrounding the Watergate break-in.

Martin didn’t replace Paul A. Volcker (CFR, TC, and BB) as chairman (1979-1987). Instead, Alan Greenspan was appointed as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Burns (CFR) suggested that a review board be established to evaluate wage and price freezes. [15] Nixon’s handlers created a comprehensive New Deal, Democratic-style strategy called the New Economic Policy after clandestine consultations at Camp David with George P. Shultz (CFR), Burns, Paul W. McCracken (CFR), Caspar W. Weinberger (CFR, TC), H.R. Haldeman, John Ehrlichman, Peter G. Peterson (CFR), Volcker, John Connally and Speechwriter Bill Safire. Volcker initiated the collapse of the U.S. economy. He has, since 1952, as an economist for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, influenced U.S. economic policies. In 1962 he became the director of financial analysis at the Treasury Department and in 1963 he was appointed as deputy under-secretary for monetary affairs. He returned to the Treasury as under-secretary (1969-1974) where he promoted international solutions to monetary problems.

The House of Rothschild continues to influence the U.S. economy and domestic and foreign policies. Volcker, after having served as the Federal Reserve Chairman under Presidents Carter and Reagan, went to work for the Rothschilds as chairman of the European investment-banking firm, J. Rothschild, Wolfensohn and Co. in March 1992. Since February 2009, he has been the Chairman of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board under the obedient President Barack Obama who continues to decimate the economy at the behest of the international bankers.

Richard N. Goodwin, former speechwriter for President John F. Kennedy (assassinated in 1963), said, “The principal power in Washington is no longer the government or the people it represents. It is the Money Power. Under the deceptive cloak of campaign contributions, access and influence, votes and amendments are bought and sold. Money establishes priorities of action, holds down federal revenues, revises federal legislation, and shifts income from the middle class to the very rich.” [16] “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” [17]

---

[1] The Secret World Government or “The Hidden Hand” by General Cherep-Spiridovich, The Anti-Bolshevist Publishing Association, New York, 1926, p. 8

[2] Charles Lindbergh’s – September 11, 1941, Des Moines Speech, K_F48oaOskI

[3] Henry Kissinger was quoted in Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United States Betrayed Its Own POW’s in Vietnam by Monika Jensen-Stevenson and William Stevenson, Plume Publishing, New York, 1999

[4] Judaism Discovered, a Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self Worship, Superstition and Deceit by Michael Hoffman, Independent History and Research, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, 2008, pp. 473-474

[5] The Synagogue of Satan, the Secret History of Jewish World Domination by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock, River Crest Publishing, Austin, Texas, 2007, p. 102

[6] The Iron Curtain Over America by John Beaty, Chestnut Mountain Book, Barboursville, Virginia, 1968, pp. 26-27

[7] The High Priests of War, The Secret History of How America’s “Neo-Conservative” Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in their Drive for Global Empire by Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press, Washington, DC, 2005, p. 39

[8] Kristol Clear at Time by David Corn, The Nation, January 2, 2007, http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames/153112

[9] The High Priests of War, The Secret History of How America’s “Neo-Conservative” Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in their Drive for Global Empire by Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press, Washington, DC, 2005, p. 8

[10] Ibid, p. 117

[11] Ibid, p. 39

[12] Money, the 12^th & Final Religion by R. Duane Willing, The Barnes Review, Washington, DC, 2008, pp. 8-9

[13] Ibid, pp. 8-9

[14] Ibid, pp. 8-9

[15] Arthur Burns, http://c250.columbia.edu/c250_celebrates/remarkable_columbians/arthur_burns.html

[16] Quotes of Interest, http://webpages.charter.net/hartgers/wealth/quotes.html

[17] King James, Ephesians 6:12, See other translations of this verse http://bible.cc/ephesians/6-12.htm.

« Previous Page — Next Page »