Top

South Pasadena vs. freedom of speech

March 7, 2008

This past week, the first week in March, was declared by the City Council of South Pasadena, California, as “Cuss Free Week“.

This past week, anyone caught using “offensive” language in South Pasadena wouldn’t likely be thrown in jail just for that. But, according to the Associated Press, “you could be shamed into better behavior by the unsettling glares of residents who take their reputation for civility seriously.”

I think this is ridiculous.

This is 2008. The American culture has evolved to where it’s much more relaxed than it used to be in many ways. And people cuss more liberally than they used to. While I think most civilized Americans have the good sense to avoid using four-letter words in the presence of young children and business clients, do we really have to worry about the possibility of offending the little old lady from Pasadena?

In today’s more relaxed society, many people cuss without even thinking about it. You stub your toe and a four-letter word automatically flies out of your mouth. You’d better hope you don’t stub that toe in South Pasadena.

Will South Pasadena also ban cable television? After all, a single episode of the award-winning series “The Sopranos” typically features more four-letter words than a boat full of drunken sailors. It’s art imitating life.

I’m not saying that we should all strive towards frequent cussing. I agree that it’s probably overdone in today’s society. And, while it can be a dramatic way of verbally punctuating a point, it’s often also a sign of rhetorical laziness and a lacking vocabulary.

However, outlawing it is not the answer.

This is America, and the First Amendment supposedly guarantees freedom of speech. Sure, there are some situations in which you have to curb it, like when your speech would incite dangerous or illegal behavior.

But if I automatically utter a four-letter word upon stubbing my toe, I am not endangering anyone’s wellbeing, and I am not calling for criminal behavior. I’m simply venting.

South Pasadena sees cussing as a threat to its reputation for civility. But what is true civility?

Instead of worrying about people who might be offended by words, perhaps South Pasadena should be worrying about the effects of censorship and intolerance. I find the latter much more offensive.

Hey, South Pasadena, repeat after me: “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” Not even the four-letter kind.

Mary Shaw is a regular columnist for Novakeo.com
Mary Shaw is a Philadelphia-based writer and activist, with a focus on politics, human rights, and social justice. She is a former Philadelphia Area Coordinator for the Nobel-Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International, and her views appear regularly in a variety of newspapers, magazines, and websites. Note that the ideas expressed here are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Amnesty International or any other organization with which she may be associated. E-mail:


Latest from Mary Shaw

  1. » Rights Groups React To Bradley Manning Verdict
  2. » Did Texas Execute Yet Another Innocent Man?
  3. » Is Kony 2012 The Right Thing To Do?
  4. » 500 U.S. Deaths From Police Tasers
  5. » New SCOTUS Decision In Abu-Jamal Case Is Good, But Not Enough
  6. » No True Justice For The West Memphis Three
  7. » Oil, water, and America's price priorities
  • http://teaching-and-all-that-jazz.blogspot.com Ken Albin

    I am in my own battle concerning censorship. I post a rather innocent blog that tells about what the life of a high school science teacher is like. Little did I know when I started my blog that I would receive verbal pressure from my local school administrators as well as an attempt to frighten me into silence because of my blog posts. They are not illegal and do not contain libelous personal comments directed towards any named individual. Some county administrators simply do not like some of the things I have stated, though they are truthful statements. From a meeting with one of them I was told that they did not want “dirty laundry” presented to the public about education. I think they are basically worried about their images. After all, in this day and age image is everything.

    I would appeciate anyone interested in freedom to read my last post about this situation and comment on it. Before doing so, please look over my posts and see that there is nothing vicious or untruthful there. The only thing they could attack me on was the alleged “proprietary use of ESIS grading program screenshots” in making a humorous video parody of the program. They had their lawyers send a threatening certified letter to my home about this. I feel that it is just another way of pressuring me to stop posting about teaching but since I have better things to do with my money and time than fight court battles over something so silly I deleted the video and photos. Again, please look at my blog and decide for yourself if there is anything that violates decency or laws. Thanks.

  • http://teaching-and-all-that-jazz.blogspot.com Ken Albin

    I am in my own battle concerning censorship. I post a rather innocent blog that tells about what the life of a high school science teacher is like. Little did I know when I started my blog that I would receive verbal pressure from my local school administrators as well as an attempt to frighten me into silence because of my blog posts. They are not illegal and do not contain libelous personal comments directed towards any named individual. Some county administrators simply do not like some of the things I have stated, though they are truthful statements. From a meeting with one of them I was told that they did not want “dirty laundry” presented to the public about education. I think they are basically worried about their images. After all, in this day and age image is everything.

    I would appeciate anyone interested in freedom to read my last post about this situation and comment on it. Before doing so, please look over my posts and see that there is nothing vicious or untruthful there. The only thing they could attack me on was the alleged “proprietary use of ESIS grading program screenshots” in making a humorous video parody of the program. They had their lawyers send a threatening certified letter to my home about this. I feel that it is just another way of pressuring me to stop posting about teaching but since I have better things to do with my money and time than fight court battles over something so silly I deleted the video and photos. Again, please look at my blog and decide for yourself if there is anything that violates decency or laws. Thanks.

Bottom