Female Gender Confusion Is In The Jeans

Deuteronomy 22:5 – The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

(It’s autumn and I am seeing many women wearing jeans. Here is my updated annual warning about this symptom of gender confusion, i.e lesbianism.)

It takes vision to see what is in front of your eyes all the time.

“Slovenly,” “Drab,” “Unkempt,” “Slatternly”  –many adjectives  describe  most women who wear jeans.

Since I noticed this trend, I am appalled by its pervasiveness. At least half of the women I see are wearing jeans.

Jeans are a fitting feminist symbol. They are farm workers’ and miners’ clothes. Feminism is an invention of the central bankers who also created and financed the socialist and communist movements to control people.

By wearing jeans, women are signaling loyalty to this drab unisex proletarian vision, where women work like men, look like men, and fornicate like men (i.e. dogs.)

Can it be any more obvious? If the sexes dress alike, it is because they are becoming alike.

Femininity is defined by being attractive to men. What is more attractive to men? A dress or farmer’s overalls? Being feminine means being the opposite of men. But gender disorder (lesbianism) takes place when women distrust men and try to compensate by becoming like men.

(See Makow “Here Come the Lesbian Rangers.” )

CULT OF THE ANDROGYNOUS

Often I see married couples clad in blue denim, him and hers. Occasionally there is an eldest daughter already promised to this androgynous cult.

The first time this article appeared, I got a storm of criticism from women who said jeans can be feminine. Yes, if you are incredibly sexy in the first place, (but you’d look good in anything.) Ladies, jeans (and pants in general) emphasize the caboose. Women who deny their feminine instincts tend to develop an ample one.

Men, a woman wearing jeans is a red flag that you might be dealing with “GID” –“gender identity disorder.” Her jeans are saying: “I don’t want to be a woman. I don’t want to look good for men. I fear and distrust men. I want male prerogatives. I want to look like a man. I want to be a man.”

A woman’s primary career used to be wife and mother.  The Illuminati bankers didn’t want marriages, families or children. So they convinced women that these were “oppressive” just like earlier they convinced workers or Blacks they were oppressed. The bankers care nothing about women, Blacks or even gays. They use them for their own ends.

Feminism espoused “women’s rights” but it has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, children and society.

Young women never imagined they would be betrayed by traitorous feminist teachers and politicians,  intent on breaking up the family and abandoning us to State and corporate control.

They never imagined that the “women’s movement” was inspired and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation as part of their ongoing social engineering program. Google “Women’s Studies” and “Rockefeller Foundation” and you’ll get 180,000 results. Do you really think the world’s biggest monopoly capitalists, who fund Planned Parenthood, birth control and eugenic research, don’t have an ulterior motive for feminism?

The Rockefellers are central bankers. In the words of insider Carroll Quigley, their  ultimate goal is “nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled …by the central banks…acting in concert.” ( Tragedy and Hope, 324)

Under the guise of defending homosexual rights, heterosexuals are under ruthless and hateful psychological attack in the mass media and from government. In the UK, Australia and California, the terms “mom and dad” have been banned from schools and children are encouraged to experiment with homosexuality. They want us to be homosexual in the sense that gays usually have sex but don’t marry and have families. They want to destroy the family because lonely confused people are easier to manipulate. This is the real story behind the “sexual revolution.”

There is a Stalinist feminist stigma against looking feminine. Hopefully the popularity of “Mad Men” and the beauty of Don Draper’s wife Betty wearing summer dresses will bring feminine attire back.

Truly liberated women can make a statement by wearing a skirt or dress. They can show they aren’t afraid of men, and may actually like them. Christine, a Toronto woman, does this and gets a very positive response:

“Several years ago, I gave up dressing like a man for religious reasons (and no, I am not a Muslim, although it is rather peculiar to see Muslim women in blue jeans and head scarves.) Since the traditional garb of a Western woman is a skirt or dress… I try to wear that. And I do try to dress neatly. When I made this decision, I didn’t think about how it would affect men. Nevertheless, its effect on men has been most touching. It brings out the best in them and they seem to like it. Some are even vocal in their approval; only one has said he disapproved.”

Men should politely voice approval and support of women who are dressed in a feminine way.

There is nothing more beautiful than a women wearing a summer dress. I can still remember a young woman I saw five years ago wearing a frock. That’s how powerful femininity is. Let’s not let highly-paid pious feminist and lesbian “change agents” destroy it. It’s time for real women to relegate jeans to garden work.

Source: Henry Makow Ph.D.